CVE-2023-54295: mtd: spi-nor: Fix shift-out-of-bounds in spi_nor_set_erase_type
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 0/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.20% (FIRST EPSS).
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 53b2916ebde741c657a857fa1936c0d9fcb59170, 61d44a4db2f54dbac7d22c2541574ea5755e0468, 99341b8aee7b5b4255b339345bbcaa35867dfd0c.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 53b2916ebde741c657a857fa1936c0d9fcb59170, 61d44a4db2f54dbac7d22c2541574ea5755e0468, 99341b8aee7b5b4255b339345bbcaa35867dfd0c or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mtd: spi-nor: Fix shift-out-of-bounds in spi_nor_set_erase_type spi_nor_set_erase_type() was used either to set or to mask out an erase type. When we used it to mask out an erase type a shift-out-of-bounds was hit: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c:2237:24 shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 32-bit type 'int' The setting of the size_{shift, mask} and of the opcode are unnecessary when the erase size is zero, as throughout the code just the erase size is considered to determine whether an erase type is supported or not. Setting the opcode to 0xFF was wrong too as nobody guarantees that 0xFF is an unused opcode. Thus when masking out an erase type, just set the erase size to zero. This will fix the shift-out-of-bounds. [ta: refine changes, new commit message, fix compilation error]
- Published
- Dec 30, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 10th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
0
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 0 / 40 · —
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 4.20affected
- 5390a8df769ec9ba9c995191bb0867430f602ebb and later · before e6409208c13f7c56adc12dd795abf4141e3d5e64affected · git
- 5390a8df769ec9ba9c995191bb0867430f602ebb and later · before 61d44a4db2f54dbac7d22c2541574ea5755e0468affected · git
- 5390a8df769ec9ba9c995191bb0867430f602ebb and later · before 53b2916ebde741c657a857fa1936c0d9fcb59170affected · git
- 5390a8df769ec9ba9c995191bb0867430f602ebb and later · before 99341b8aee7b5b4255b339345bbcaa35867dfd0caffected · git
- 5390a8df769ec9ba9c995191bb0867430f602ebb and later · before f0f0cfdc3a024e21161714f2e05f0df3b84d42adaffected · git
- before 4.20not affected · semver
- 5.10.173 and later · up to and including 5.10.*not affected · semver
- 5.15.99 and later · up to and including 5.15.*not affected · semver
- 6.1.16 and later · up to and including 6.1.*not affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | linux | before 6.1.20-1 | 6.1.20-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-74705udp: fix potential use-after-free in tunnel segmentation40Plan
- CVE-2026-74612veth: fix skb length accounting after XDP frag adjustment40Plan
- CVE-2026-74475vxlan: use neigh_ha_snapshot() in route_shortcircuit()40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-54293Dec 30, 2025 · bcache: fixup btree_cache_wait list damage0Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-54294Dec 30, 2025 · md/raid10: fix memleak of md thread0Monitor
- Later →CVE-2023-54296Dec 30, 2025 · KVM: SVM: Get source vCPUs from source VM for SEV-ES intrahost migration0Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 53b2916ebde741c657a857fa1936c0d9fcb59170 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 61d44a4db2f54dbac7d22c2541574ea5755e0468 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 99341b8aee7b5b4255b339345bbcaa35867dfd0c | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | e6409208c13f7c56adc12dd795abf4141e3d5e64 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | f0f0cfdc3a024e21161714f2e05f0df3b84d42ad | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:linux | 6.1.20-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
No CVSS vector for this record, so attack conditions can't be derived.
Weakness class (CWE)
—
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.