CVE-2023-54268: debugobjects: Don't wake up kswapd from fill_pool()
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 0/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.20% (FIRST EPSS).
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 4c088d30a72d9b8f9c6ae9362222942e4075cb00, aee97eec77029270866c704f66cdf2881cbd2fe1, be646802b3dc408c4dc72a3ac32c3f4a0282414d.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 4c088d30a72d9b8f9c6ae9362222942e4075cb00, aee97eec77029270866c704f66cdf2881cbd2fe1, be646802b3dc408c4dc72a3ac32c3f4a0282414d or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: debugobjects: Don't wake up kswapd from fill_pool() syzbot is reporting a lockdep warning in fill_pool() because the allocation from debugobjects is using GFP_ATOMIC, which is (__GFP_HIGH | __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM) and therefore tries to wake up kswapd, which acquires kswapd_wait::lock. Since fill_pool() might be called with arbitrary locks held, fill_pool() should not assume that acquiring kswapd_wait::lock is safe. Use __GFP_HIGH instead and remove __GFP_NORETRY as it is pointless for !__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM allocation.
- Published
- Dec 30, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 10th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
0
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 0 / 40 · —
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 2.6.26affected
- 3ac7fe5a4aab409bd5674d0b070bce97f9d20872 and later · before be646802b3dc408c4dc72a3ac32c3f4a0282414daffected · git
- 3ac7fe5a4aab409bd5674d0b070bce97f9d20872 and later · before fd673079749bac97bb30f1461df079e6c8e86511affected · git
- 3ac7fe5a4aab409bd5674d0b070bce97f9d20872 and later · before aee97eec77029270866c704f66cdf2881cbd2fe1affected · git
- 3ac7fe5a4aab409bd5674d0b070bce97f9d20872 and later · before d7fff52c99d52f180d8bef95d8ed8fec6343889caffected · git
- 3ac7fe5a4aab409bd5674d0b070bce97f9d20872 and later · before 4c088d30a72d9b8f9c6ae9362222942e4075cb00affected · git
- 3ac7fe5a4aab409bd5674d0b070bce97f9d20872 and later · before eb799279fb1f9c63c520fe8c1c41cb9154252db6affected · git
- before 2.6.26not affected · semver
- 5.4.244 and later · up to and including 5.4.*not affected · semver
- 5.10.181 and later · up to and including 5.10.*not affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | linux | before 6.1.37-1 | 6.1.37-1 |
| Debian:13 | linux | before 6.3.7-1 | 6.3.7-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-74705udp: fix potential use-after-free in tunnel segmentation40Plan
- CVE-2026-74612veth: fix skb length accounting after XDP frag adjustment40Plan
- CVE-2026-74475vxlan: use neigh_ha_snapshot() in route_shortcircuit()40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-54266Dec 30, 2025 · media: dvb-usb: m920x: Fix a potential memory leak in m920x_i2c_xfer()0Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-54267Dec 30, 2025 · powerpc/pseries: Rework lppaca_shared_proc() to avoid DEBUG_PREEMPT0Monitor
- Later →CVE-2023-54270Dec 30, 2025 · media: usb: siano: Fix use after free bugs caused by do_submit_urb0Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 4c088d30a72d9b8f9c6ae9362222942e4075cb00 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | aee97eec77029270866c704f66cdf2881cbd2fe1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | be646802b3dc408c4dc72a3ac32c3f4a0282414d | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | d7fff52c99d52f180d8bef95d8ed8fec6343889c | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | eb799279fb1f9c63c520fe8c1c41cb9154252db6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | fd673079749bac97bb30f1461df079e6c8e86511 | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:linux | 6.1.37-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
No CVSS vector for this record, so attack conditions can't be derived.
Weakness class (CWE)
—
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (5 more)Show less
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee97eec77029270866c704f66cdf2881cbd2fe1
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/be646802b3dc408c4dc72a3ac32c3f4a0282414d
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/d7fff52c99d52f180d8bef95d8ed8fec6343889c
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb799279fb1f9c63c520fe8c1c41cb9154252db6
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd673079749bac97bb30f1461df079e6c8e86511
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.