Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA Linux

CVE-2022-50483: net: enetc: avoid buffer leaks on xdp_do_redirect() failure

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.43% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: Linux Linux 306526331e7a37e714e11ab7c6d73eb004745224, 628050ec952d2e2e46ec9fb6aa07e41139e030c8, 7fba523b51ccce5f7981f8a43ad84d664da68131.
  • Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 7.5, NVD 5.5.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 306526331e7a37e714e11ab7c6d73eb004745224, 628050ec952d2e2e46ec9fb6aa07e41139e030c8, 7fba523b51ccce5f7981f8a43ad84d664da68131 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: enetc: avoid buffer leaks on xdp_do_redirect() failure Before enetc_clean_rx_ring_xdp() calls xdp_do_redirect(), each software BD in the RX ring between index orig_i and i can have one of 2 refcount values on its page. We are the owner of the current buffer that is being processed, so the refcount will be at least 1. If the current owner of the buffer at the diametrically opposed index in the RX ring (i.o.w, the other half of this page) has not yet called kfree(), this page's refcount could even be 2. enetc_page_reusable() in enetc_flip_rx_buff() tests for the page refcount against 1, and [ if it's 2 ] does not attempt to reuse it. But if enetc_flip_rx_buff() is put after the xdp_do_redirect() call, the page refcount can have one of 3 values. It can also be 0, if there is no owner of the other page half, and xdp_do_redirect() for this buffer ran so far that it triggered a flush of the devmap/cpumap bulk queue, and the consumers of those bulk queues also freed the buffer, all by the time xdp_do_redirect() returns the execution back to enetc. This is the reason why enetc_flip_rx_buff() is called before xdp_do_redirect(), but there is a big flaw with that reasoning: enetc_flip_rx_buff() will set rx_swbd->page = NULL on both sides of the enetc_page_reusable() branch, and if xdp_do_redirect() returns an error, we call enetc_xdp_free(), which does not deal gracefully with that. In fact, what happens is quite special. The page refcounts start as 1. enetc_flip_rx_buff() figures they're reusable, transfers these rx_swbd->page pointers to a different rx_swbd in enetc_reuse_page(), and bumps the refcount to 2. When xdp_do_redirect() later returns an error, we call the no-op enetc_xdp_free(), but we still haven't lost the reference to that page. A copy of it is still at rx_ring->next_to_alloc, but that has refcount 2 (and there are no concurrent owners of it in flight, to drop the refcount). What really kills the system is when we'll flip the rx_swbd->page the second time around. With an updated refcount of 2, the page will not be reusable and we'll really leak it. Then enetc_new_page() will have to allocate more pages, which will then eventually leak again on further errors from xdp_do_redirect(). The problem, summarized, is that we zeroize rx_swbd->page before we're completely done with it, and this makes it impossible for the error path to do something with it. Since the packet is potentially multi-buffer and therefore the rx_swbd->page is potentially an array, manual passing of the old pointers between enetc_flip_rx_buff() and enetc_xdp_free() is a bit difficult. For the sake of going with a simple solution, we accept the possibility of racing with xdp_do_redirect(), and we move the flip procedure to execute only on the redirect success path. By racing, I mean that the page may be deemed as not reusable by enetc (having a refcount of 0), but there will be no leak in that case, either. Once we accept that, we have something better to do with buffers on XDP_REDIRECT failure. Since we haven't performed half-page flipping yet, we won't, either (and this way, we can avoid enetc_xdp_free() completely, which gives the entire page to the slab allocator). Instead, we'll call enetc_xdp_drop(), which will recycle this half of the buffer back to the RX ring.

MediumCVSS 5.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Oct 4, 2025
Updated
Aug 5, 2026
EPSS
0.4% · 38th percentile
CWE
—

Report tools

JSON

Action score

22

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.4%

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
5.5
CNA · Linux
7.5
2.0 point gap

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2022-50483

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
linuxlinux kernel

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • linux linux kernel5.13 and later · before 5.15.86
  • linux linux kernel5.16 and later · before 6.0.16
  • linux linux kernel6.1 and later · before 6.1.2

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Linux Linux

    • 5.13affected
    • 9d2b68cc108db2fdb35022ed2d88cfb305c441a6 and later · before bcf2c1dc5358dcf7e34a68cdb6b0bbf967801efaaffected · git
    • 9d2b68cc108db2fdb35022ed2d88cfb305c441a6 and later · before 7fba523b51ccce5f7981f8a43ad84d664da68131affected · git
    • 9d2b68cc108db2fdb35022ed2d88cfb305c441a6 and later · before 306526331e7a37e714e11ab7c6d73eb004745224affected · git
    • 9d2b68cc108db2fdb35022ed2d88cfb305c441a6 and later · before 628050ec952d2e2e46ec9fb6aa07e41139e030c8affected · git
    • before 5.13not affected · semver
    • 5.15.86 and later · up to and including 5.15.*not affected · semver
    • 6.0.16 and later · up to and including 6.0.*not affected · semver
    • 6.1.2 and later · up to and including 6.1.*not affected · semver
    • 6.2 and laternot affected · original_commit_for_fix

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12linuxbefore 6.1.4-16.1.4-1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-31431crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-placeKEV
    90Now
  • CVE-2022-0847A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copy_page_to_iter_pipe…KEV
    89Now
  • CVE-2021-22555Heap Out-Of-Bounds Write in Netfilter IP6T_SO_SET_REPLACEKEV
    85Now

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2022-50478Oct 4, 2025 · nilfs2: fix shift-out-of-bounds/overflow in nilfs_sb2_bad_offset()
    28Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2022-50480Oct 4, 2025 · memory: pl353-smc: Fix refcount leak bug in pl353_smc_probe()
    22Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2022-50484Oct 4, 2025 · ALSA: usb-audio: Fix potential memory leaks
    22Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Linux Linux306526331e7a37e714e11ab7c6d73eb004745224Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linux628050ec952d2e2e46ec9fb6aa07e41139e030c8Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linux7fba523b51ccce5f7981f8a43ad84d664da68131Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linuxbcf2c1dc5358dcf7e34a68cdb6b0bbf967801efaVendor (CNA)
debian:linux6.1.4-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

—

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records