Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2022-44571· NVD / CVE Program· CNA hackerone

There is a denial of service vulnerability in the Content-Disposition parsingcomponent of Rack fixed in 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.4.1, 3.0.0.1.

There is a denial of service vulnerability in the Content-Disposition parsingcomponent of Rack fixed in 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.4.1, 3.0.0.1. This could allow an attacker to craft an input that can cause Content-Disposition header parsing in Rackto take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial ofservice attack vector. This header is used typically used in multipartparsing. Any applications that parse multipart posts using Rack (virtuallyall Rails applications) are impacted.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help
Published
Feb 9, 2023
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
1.5% · 73th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

30

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 1.5%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
rackrack

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • rack rack2.0.0 and later · before 2.0.9.2
  • rack rack2.1.0 and later · before 2.1.4.2
  • rack rack2.2.0 and later · before 2.2.6.1
  • rack rack3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.0.4.1

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (hackerone). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • n/a https://github.com/rack/rack

    • 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.4.1, 3.0.0.1affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:10ruby-rackbefore 2.0.6-3+deb10u22.0.6-3+deb10u2
Debian:11ruby-rackbefore 2.1.4-3+deb11u12.1.4-3+deb11u1
Debian:12ruby-rackbefore 2.2.4-32.2.4-3
openSUSE:Tumbleweedruby3.2-rubygem-rackbefore 3.0.7-1.23.0.7-1.2
openSUSE:Tumbleweedruby3.2-rubygem-rack-2.2before 2.2.7-1.12.2.7-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rackbefore 3.0.9.1-1.13.0.9.1-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rackbefore 3.1.18-1.33.1.18-1.3
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rackbefore 3.1.12-1.13.1.12-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rackbefore 3.0.4.1-1.13.0.4.1-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rack-2.2before 2.2.11-1.12.2.11-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rack-2.2before 2.2.6.2-1.12.2.6.2-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rack-2.2before 2.2.22-1.12.2.22-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rack-2.2before 2.2.8.1-1.12.2.8.1-1.1
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8foremanbefore 0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8foreman-debugbefore 0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8puppet-agentbefore 0:7.26.0-3.el8sat0:7.26.0-3.el8sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8puppetserverbefore 0:7.11.0-1.el8sat0:7.11.0-1.el8sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8python-djangobefore 0:3.2.21-1.el8pc0:3.2.21-1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8python-futurebefore 0:0.18.3-1.el8pc0:0.18.3-1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8python-gitpythonbefore 0:3.1.32-1.el8pc0:3.1.32-1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8python-pulp-ansiblebefore 1:0.16.0-1.el8pc1:0.16.0-1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8python-requestsbefore 0:2.31.0-1.el8pc0:2.31.0-1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8python-sqlparsebefore 0:0.4.4-1.el8pc0:0.4.4-1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8python39-djangobefore 0:3.2.21-1.el8pc0:3.2.21-1.el8pc

+32

Same product

rack: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2024-25126Rack ReDos in content type parsing (2nd degree polynomial)
    41Plan
  • CVE-2024-26146Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Header Parsing
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2023-27530A DoS vulnerability exists in Rack <v3.0.4.2, <v2.2.6.3, <v2.1.4.3 and <v2.0.9.3 within in the Multipart MIME parsing code in which could al
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2026-34827Rack: Algorithmic-Complexity DoS in Rack::Multipart::Parser
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2026-34830Rack: Rack::Sendfile regex injection via HTTP_X_ACCEL_MAPPING header allows arbitrary file reads through nginx
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2026-34829Rack: Denial of Service via Unbounded Multipart File Upload Without Content-Length
    30Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
n/a https://github.com/rack/rack2.0.9.2 · descriptionVendor (CNA)
debian:ruby-rack2.2.4-3 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:ruby3.2-rubygem-rack3.0.7-1.2 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
opensuse:ruby3.2-rubygem-rack-2.22.2.7-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
opensuse:rubygem-rack2.0.8-150000.3.12.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.4Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:rubygem-rack-2.22.2.6.2-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-cli0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite_utils:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-debug0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-dynflow-sidekiq0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-ec20:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-journald0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-libvirt0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-openstack0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:puppet-agent0:7.26.0-3.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:python-pulp-ansible1:0.16.0-1.el8pc · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:python39-pulp-ansible1:0.16.0-1.el8pc · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:rubygem-kubeclient0:4.10.1-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
RubyGems:rack2.0.9.2Package registry (OSV)
RubyGems:rack2.1.4.2Package registry (OSV)
RubyGems:rack2.2.6.1Package registry (OSV)
RubyGems:rack3.0.4.1Package registry (OSV)
suse:rubygem-rack2.0.8-150000.3.12.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP1Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

Code that parses nested structures sets no depth or size limit. A small input can turn into a disproportionate processing load.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
function expand(node) {  return node.children.map(expand);}

Fixed

ts
const MAX_DEPTH = 32;function expand(node, depth = 0) {  if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) throw new Error("too deep");  return node.children.map((c) => expand(c, depth + 1));}

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records