Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2022-44570· NVD / CVE Program· CNA hackerone

A denial of service vulnerability in the Range header parsing component of Rack >= 1.5.0.

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.6% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 75.5% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: ruby-rack (Debian:10) 2.0.6-3+deb10u2; ruby-rack (Debian:11) 2.1.4-3+deb11u1; ruby-rack (Debian:12) 2.2.4-3.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to ruby-rack (Debian:10) 2.0.6-3+deb10u2; ruby-rack (Debian:11) 2.1.4-3+deb11u1; ruby-rack (Debian:12) 2.2.4-3 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

A denial of service vulnerability in the Range header parsing component of Rack >= 1.5.0. A Carefully crafted input can cause the Range header parsing component in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. Any applications that deal with Range requests (such as streaming applications, or applications that serve files) may be impacted.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Feb 9, 2023
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
1.6% · 76th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

30

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 1.6%

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2022-44570

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Port scanning: 5 full scans a day (members only)
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Verify your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
rackrack

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • rack rack1.5.0 and later · before 2.0.9.2
  • rack rack2.1.0 and later · before 2.1.4.2
  • rack rack2.2.0 and later · before 2.2.6.1
  • rack rack3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.4.1

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (hackerone). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • n/a https://github.com/rack/rack

    • 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.4.2, 3.0.0.1affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:10ruby-rackbefore 2.0.6-3+deb10u22.0.6-3+deb10u2
Debian:11ruby-rackbefore 2.1.4-3+deb11u12.1.4-3+deb11u1
Debian:12ruby-rackbefore 2.2.4-32.2.4-3
openSUSE:Tumbleweedruby3.2-rubygem-rackbefore 3.0.7-1.23.0.7-1.2
openSUSE:Tumbleweedruby3.2-rubygem-rack-2.2before 2.2.7-1.12.2.7-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rackbefore 3.0.9.1-1.13.0.9.1-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rackbefore 3.1.18-1.33.1.18-1.3
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rackbefore 3.1.12-1.13.1.12-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rackbefore 3.0.4.1-1.13.0.4.1-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rack-2.2before 2.2.11-1.12.2.11-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rack-2.2before 2.2.6.2-1.12.2.6.2-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rack-2.2before 2.2.22-1.12.2.22-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rack-2.2before 2.2.8.1-1.12.2.8.1-1.1
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8foremanbefore 0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8foreman-debugbefore 0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8puppet-agentbefore 0:7.26.0-3.el8sat0:7.26.0-3.el8sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8puppetserverbefore 0:7.11.0-1.el8sat0:7.11.0-1.el8sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8python-djangobefore 0:3.2.21-1.el8pc0:3.2.21-1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8python-futurebefore 0:0.18.3-1.el8pc0:0.18.3-1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8python-gitpythonbefore 0:3.1.32-1.el8pc0:3.1.32-1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8python-pulp-ansiblebefore 1:0.16.0-1.el8pc1:0.16.0-1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8python-requestsbefore 0:2.31.0-1.el8pc0:2.31.0-1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8python-sqlparsebefore 0:0.4.4-1.el8pc0:0.4.4-1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8python39-djangobefore 0:3.2.21-1.el8pc0:3.2.21-1.el8pc

+32

Same product

rack: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2024-25126Rack ReDos in content type parsing (2nd degree polynomial)
    41Plan
  • CVE-2024-26146Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Header Parsing
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2023-27530A DoS vulnerability exists in Rack <v3.0.4.2, <v2.2.6.3, <v2.1.4.3 and <v2.0.9.3 within in the Multipart MIME parsing code in which could al
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2026-34827Rack: Algorithmic-Complexity DoS in Rack::Multipart::Parser
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2026-34830Rack: Rack::Sendfile regex injection via HTTP_X_ACCEL_MAPPING header allows arbitrary file reads through nginx
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2026-34829Rack: Denial of Service via Unbounded Multipart File Upload Without Content-Length
    30Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:ruby-rack2.2.4-3 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:ruby3.2-rubygem-rack3.0.7-1.2 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
opensuse:ruby3.2-rubygem-rack-2.22.2.7-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
opensuse:rubygem-rack2.0.8-150000.3.12.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.4Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:rubygem-rack-2.22.2.6.2-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-cli0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite_utils:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-debug0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-dynflow-sidekiq0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-ec20:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-journald0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-libvirt0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-openstack0:3.7.0.9-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:puppet-agent0:7.26.0-3.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:python-pulp-ansible1:0.16.0-1.el8pc · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:python39-pulp-ansible1:0.16.0-1.el8pc · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
red hat:rubygem-kubeclient0:4.10.1-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.14::el8Package registry (OSV)
RubyGems:rack2.0.9.2Package registry (OSV)
RubyGems:rack2.1.4.2Package registry (OSV)
RubyGems:rack2.2.6.2Package registry (OSV)
RubyGems:rack3.0.4.1Package registry (OSV)
suse:rubygem-rack2.0.8-150000.3.12.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP1Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

Code that parses nested structures sets no depth or size limit. A small input can turn into a disproportionate processing load.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
function expand(node) {  return node.children.map(expand);}

Fixed

ts
const MAX_DEPTH = 32;function expand(node, depth = 0) {  if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) throw new Error("too deep");  return node.children.map((c) => expand(c, depth + 1));}

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records