CVE-2021-41136: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request Smuggling') in puma
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 14/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 68.6% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. A user must open a link or visit a page. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: puma (Debian:10) 3.12.0-2+deb10u3; puma (Debian:11) 4.3.8-1+deb11u2; puma (Debian:12) 5.5.2-1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to puma (Debian:10) 3.12.0-2+deb10u3; puma (Debian:11) 4.3.8-1+deb11u2; puma (Debian:12) 5.5.2-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Puma is a HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. Prior to versions 5.5.1 and 4.3.9, using `puma` with a proxy which forwards HTTP header values which contain the LF character could allow HTTP request smugggling. A client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. The only proxy which has this behavior, as far as the Puma team is aware of, is Apache Traffic Server. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the first request's body. Puma, however, would see it as two requests, and when processing the second request, send back a response that the proxy does not expect. If the proxy has reused the persistent connection to Puma to send another request for a different client, the second response from the first client will be sent to the second client. This vulnerability was patched in Puma 5.5.1 and 4.3.9. As a workaround, do not use Apache Traffic Server with `puma`.
- Published
- Oct 12, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.2% · 68th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-444
Report tools
Action score
14
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 14 / 40 · 3.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.2%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 3.7
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 3.7
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
puma puma
- >= 5.0.0, < 5.5.1, < 4.3.9affected
Affected versions · NVD (4)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- debian debian linux10.0
- debian debian linux11.0
- puma pumaup to 4.3.8 inclusive
- puma puma5.0.0 and later · up to 5.5.0 inclusive
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:10 | puma | before 3.12.0-2+deb10u3 | 3.12.0-2+deb10u3 |
| Debian:11 | puma | before 4.3.8-1+deb11u2 | 4.3.8-1+deb11u2 |
| Debian:12 | puma | before 5.5.2-1 | 5.5.2-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | rubygem-puma | before 4.3.11-150000.3.6.2 | 4.3.11-150000.3.6.2 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ruby3.2-rubygem-puma-5 | before 5.6.5-1.7 | 5.6.5-1.7 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | rubygem-puma-4 | before 4.3.10-1.1 | 4.3.10-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | rubygem-puma-5 | before 5.6.8-1.1 | 5.6.8-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | rubygem-puma-5 | before 5.6.5-1.1 | 5.6.5-1.1 |
| Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el7 | foreman | before 0:3.1.1.21-2.el7sat | 0:3.1.1.21-2.el7sat |
| Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el7 | libsolv | before 0:0.7.22-1.el7pc | 0:0.7.22-1.el7pc |
| Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el7 | satellite | before 0:6.11.0-2.el7sat | 0:6.11.0-2.el7sat |
| Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el8 | foreman | before 0:3.1.1.21-2.el8sat | 0:3.1.1.21-2.el8sat |
| Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el8 | libsolv | before 0:0.7.22-1.el8pc | 0:0.7.22-1.el8pc |
| Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el8 | python-django | before 0:3.2.13-1.el8pc | 0:3.2.13-1.el8pc |
| Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el8 | python-lxml | before 0:4.7.1-1.el8pc | 0:4.7.1-1.el8pc |
| Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el8 | python-sqlparse | before 0:0.4.2-2.el8pc | 0:0.4.2-2.el8pc |
| Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el8 | python38-django | before 0:3.2.13-1.el8pc | 0:3.2.13-1.el8pc |
| Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el8 | satellite | before 0:6.11.0-2.el8sat | 0:6.11.0-2.el8sat |
| Red Hat:satellite:6.11::el7 | candlepin | before 0:4.1.13-1.el7sat | 0:4.1.13-1.el7sat |
| Red Hat:satellite:6.11::el7 | tfm-rubygem-actionpack | before 0:6.0.4.7-1.el7sat | 0:6.0.4.7-1.el7sat |
| Red Hat:satellite:6.11::el7 | tfm-rubygem-puma | before 0:5.6.2-1.el7sat | 0:5.6.2-1.el7sat |
| Red Hat:satellite:6.11::el7 | tfm-rubygem-puma-debuginfo | before 0:5.6.2-1.el7sat | 0:5.6.2-1.el7sat |
| Red Hat:satellite:6.11::el7 | tfm-rubygem-sidekiq | before 0:5.2.10-1.el7sat | 0:5.2.10-1.el7sat |
| Red Hat:satellite:6.11::el8 | candlepin | before 0:4.1.13-1.el8sat | 0:4.1.13-1.el8sat |
+70
Same product
puma: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2023-40175Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests in puma39Monitor
- CVE-2022-24790HTTP Request Smuggling in puma31Monitor
- CVE-2020-11077HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma31Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-11076May 22, 2020 · HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma31Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-29509May 11, 2021 · Keepalive Connections Causing Denial Of Service in puma30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2022-23634Feb 11, 2022 · Information Exposure when using Puma with Rails24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:puma | 5.5.2-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ruby3.2-rubygem-puma-5 | 5.6.5-1.7 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:rubygem-puma | 4.3.11-150000.3.6.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:rubygem-puma-4 | 4.3.10-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:rubygem-puma-5 | 5.6.5-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:candlepin | 0:4.1.13-1.el7sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.11::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:foreman | 0:3.1.1.21-2.el7sat · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libsolv | 0:0.7.22-1.el7pc · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python-django | 0:3.2.13-1.el8pc · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python-lxml | 0:4.7.1-1.el8pc · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python-sqlparse | 0:0.4.2-2.el8pc · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python38-django | 0:3.2.13-1.el8pc · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rubygem-puma | 0:5.6.2-1.el8sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.11::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:satellite | 0:6.11.0-2.el7sat · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.11::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:tfm-rubygem-actionpack | 0:6.0.4.7-1.el7sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.11::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:tfm-rubygem-puma | 0:5.6.2-1.el7sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.11::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:tfm-rubygem-sidekiq | 0:5.2.10-1.el7sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.11::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:libdb | 0:5.3.28-42.el8_4 · Rocky Linux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| RubyGems:puma | 4.3.9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| RubyGems:puma | 5.5.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ardana-ansible | 8.0+git.1632499354.a56668f-3.82.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ardana-monasca | 8.0+git.1627997000.6c3bc04-3.30.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-installation | 8.20210806-1.35.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-operations | 8.20210806-1.35.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-opsconsole | 8.20210806-1.35.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-planning | 8.20210806-1.35.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-security | 8.20210806-1.35.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-user | 8.20210806-1.35.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openstack-ec2-api | 5.0.1~dev12-4.9.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openstack-heat-templates | 0.0.0+git.1628179051.7d761bf-3.24.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
+3
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-444 · Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (6 more)Show less
- github.com/puma/puma/commit/acdc3ae571dfae0e045cf09a295280127db65c7f
- github.com/puma/puma/commit/fb6ad8f8013ab5cdbb2f444cbfabd0b4fde71139
- github.com/puma/puma/security/advisories/GHSA-48w2-rm65-62xx
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/08/msg00015.html
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-28
- www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5146
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.