CVE-2021-28689: x86: Speculative vulnerabilities with bare (non-shim) 32-bit PV guests 32-bit x86 PV guest kernels run in ring 1.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.36% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: xen (openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.2) 4.14.5_06-150300.3.35.1; xen (SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-ESPOS) 4.12.4_30-150100.3.80.1; xen (SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-ESPOS) 4.13.4_16-150200.3.65.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to xen (openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.2) 4.14.5_06-150300.3.35.1; xen (SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-ESPOS) 4.12.4_30-150100.3.80.1; xen (SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-ESPOS) 4.13.4_16-150200.3.65.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
x86: Speculative vulnerabilities with bare (non-shim) 32-bit PV guests 32-bit x86 PV guest kernels run in ring 1. At the time when Xen was developed, this area of the i386 architecture was rarely used, which is why Xen was able to use it to implement paravirtualisation, Xen's novel approach to virtualization. In AMD64, Xen had to use a different implementation approach, so Xen does not use ring 1 to support 64-bit guests. With the focus now being on 64-bit systems, and the availability of explicit hardware support for virtualization, fixing speculation issues in ring 1 is not a priority for processor companies. Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation (IBRS) is an architectural x86 extension put together to combat speculative execution sidechannel attacks, including Spectre v2. It was retrofitted in microcode to existing CPUs. For more details on Spectre v2, see: http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-254.html However, IBRS does not architecturally protect ring 0 from predictions learnt in ring 1. For more details, see: https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/deep-dives/deep-dive-indirect-branch-restricted-speculation Similar situations may exist with other mitigations for other kinds of speculative execution attacks. The situation is quite likely to be similar for speculative execution attacks which have yet to be discovered, disclosed, or mitigated.
- Published
- Jun 11, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 29th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-212
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| xen | xen | cpe:2.3:o:xen:xen |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- xen xenbefore 4.12.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (XEN). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Xen Xen
- unspecified and later · before 4.12unknown
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | xen | from 0 | — |
| openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.2 | xen | before 4.14.5_06-150300.3.35.1 | 4.14.5_06-150300.3.35.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-ESPOS | xen | before 4.12.4_30-150100.3.80.1 | 4.12.4_30-150100.3.80.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-ESPOS | xen | before 4.13.4_16-150200.3.65.1 | 4.13.4_16-150200.3.65.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15-ESPOS | xen | before 4.10.4_40-150000.3.84.1 | 4.10.4_40-150000.3.84.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP3 | xen | before 4.14.5_06-150300.3.35.1 | 4.14.5_06-150300.3.35.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP2-BCL | xen | before 4.7.6_28-43.98.1 | 4.7.6_28-43.98.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | xen | before 4.12.4_28-3.77.1 | 4.12.4_28-3.77.1 |
| SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 9 | xen | before 4.11.4_34-2.83.1 | 4.11.4_34-2.83.1 |
| SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 9 | xen | before 4.11.4_18-2.54.1 | 4.11.4_18-2.54.1 |
Same product
xen: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-10921The grant-table feature in Xen through 4.8.x does not ensure sufficient type counts for a GNTMAP_device_map and GNTMAP_host_map mapping, whi41Plan
- CVE-2017-10920The grant-table feature in Xen through 4.8.x mishandles a GNTMAP_device_map and GNTMAP_host_map mapping, when followed by only a GNTMAP_host41Plan
- CVE-2017-10918Xen through 4.8.x does not validate memory allocations during certain P2M operations, which allows guest OS users to obtain privileged host 41Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-26314Jun 9, 2021 · AMD Speculative execution with Floating-Point Value Injection22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-28687Jun 11, 2021 · HVM soft-reset crashes toolstack libxl requires all data structures passed across its public interface to be initialized before use and disp22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2021-28690Jun 29, 2021 · x86: TSX Async Abort protections not restored after S3 This issue relates to the TSX Async Abort speculative security vulnerability.26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| opensuse:xen | 4.14.5_06-150300.3.35.1 · openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:xen | 4.11.4_18-2.54.1 · SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:xen | 4.14.5_06-150300.3.35.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Jann HornGoogle Project Zero.'}]}}}
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-212 · Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or TransferCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.