Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2021-25217· NVD / CVE Program· CNA isc

A buffer overrun in lease file parsing code can be used to exploit a common vulnerability shared by dhcpd and dhclient

In ISC DHCP 4.1-ESV-R1 -> 4.1-ESV-R16, ISC DHCP 4.4.0 -> 4.4.2 (Other branches of ISC DHCP (i.e., releases in the 4.0.x series or lower and releases in the 4.3.x series) are beyond their End-of-Life (EOL) and no longer supported by ISC. From inspection it is clear that the defect is also present in releases from those series, but they have not been officially tested for the vulnerability), The outcome of encountering the defect while reading a lease that will trigger it varies, according to: the component being affected (i.e., dhclient or dhcpd) whether the package was built as a 32-bit or 64-bit binary whether the compiler flag -fstack-protection-strong was used when compiling In dhclient, ISC has not successfully reproduced the error on a 64-bit system. However, on a 32-bit system it is possible to cause dhclient to crash when reading an improper lease, which could cause network connectivity problems for an affected system due to the absence of a running DHCP client process. In dhcpd, when run in DHCPv4 or DHCPv6 mode: if the dhcpd server binary was built for a 32-bit architecture AND the -fstack-protection-strong flag was specified to the compiler, dhcpd may exit while parsing a lease file containing an objectionable lease, resulting in lack of service to clients. Additionally, the offending lease and the lease immediately following it in the lease database may be improperly deleted. if the dhcpd server binary was built for a 64-bit architecture OR if the -fstack-protection-strong compiler flag was NOT specified, the crash will not occur, but it is possible for the offending lease and the lease which immediately followed it to be improperly deleted.

HighCVSS 7.4 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
May 26, 2021
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
6.1% · 93th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

31

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
29 / 40 · 7.4 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
2 / 30 · 6.1%

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · isc
7.4
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

VendorProduct
iscdhcp
fedoraprojectfedora
debiandebian linux
siemensruggedcom rox rx1400 firmware
siemensruggedcom rox rx1400
siemensruggedcom rox rx1500 firmware
siemensruggedcom rox rx1500
siemensruggedcom rox rx1501 firmware
siemensruggedcom rox rx1501
siemensruggedcom rox rx1510 firmware
siemensruggedcom rox rx1510
siemensruggedcom rox rx1511 firmware

and 14 more

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • debian debian linux9.0
  • fedoraproject fedora33
  • fedoraproject fedora34
  • isc dhcp4.4.0 and later · up to 4.4.2 inclusive
  • isc dhcp4.1-esv
  • netapp ontap select deploy administration utilityall versions
  • netapp solidfire & hci management nodeall versions
  • siemens ruggedcom rox mx5000 firmware2.3.0 and later · before 2.15.0
  • siemens ruggedcom rox rx1400 firmwarebefore 2.15.0
  • siemens ruggedcom rox rx1500 firmware2.3.0 and later · before 2.15.0
  • siemens ruggedcom rox rx1501 firmware2.3.0 and later · before 2.15.0
  • siemens ruggedcom rox rx1510 firmware2.3.0 and later · before 2.15.0
  • siemens ruggedcom rox rx1511 firmware2.3.0 and later · before 2.15.0
  • siemens ruggedcom rox rx1512 firmware2.3.0 and later · before 2.15.0
  • siemens ruggedcom rox rx1524 firmwarebefore 2.15.0
  • siemens ruggedcom rox rx1536 firmwarebefore 2.15.0
  • siemens ruggedcom rox rx5000 firmware2.3.0 and later · before 2.15.0
  • siemens sinec insbefore 1.0
  • siemens sinec ins1.0

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (isc). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • ISC ISC DHCP

    • 4.1 ESV and later · before 4.1-ESV-R16-P1affected
    • 4.4 and later · before 4.4.2-P1affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Alpine:v3.12dhcpfrom 4.4.0 · before 4.4.2_p1-r04.4.2_p1-r0
Debian:12isc-dhcpbefore 4.4.1-2.34.4.1-2.3
Debian:9isc-dhcpbefore 4.3.5-3+deb9u24.3.5-3+deb9u2
openSUSE:Leap 15.2dhcpbefore 4.3.6.P1-lp152.8.6.14.3.6.P1-lp152.8.6.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.3dhcpbefore 4.3.6.P1-6.11.14.3.6.P1-6.11.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweeddhcpbefore 4.4.2.P1-2.44.4.2.P1-2.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientdhclientbefore 12:4.2.5-83.el7_9.112:4.2.5-83.el7_9.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientdhcpbefore 12:4.2.5-83.el7_9.112:4.2.5-83.el7_9.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientdhcp-commonbefore 12:4.2.5-83.el7_9.112:4.2.5-83.el7_9.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientdhcp-debuginfobefore 12:4.2.5-83.el7_9.112:4.2.5-83.el7_9.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientdhcp-develbefore 12:4.2.5-83.el7_9.112:4.2.5-83.el7_9.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientdhcp-libsbefore 12:4.2.5-83.el7_9.112:4.2.5-83.el7_9.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorredhat-virtualization-hostbefore 0:4.3.16-20210615.0.el7_90:4.3.16-20210615.0.el7_9
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorredhat-virtualization-host-image-updatebefore 0:4.3.16-20210615.0.el7_90:4.3.16-20210615.0.el7_9
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosdhcpbefore 12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.112:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosdhcp-clientbefore 12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.112:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosdhcp-client-debuginfobefore 12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.112:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosdhcp-commonbefore 12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.112:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosdhcp-debuginfobefore 12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.112:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosdhcp-debugsourcebefore 12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.112:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosdhcp-libsbefore 12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.112:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosdhcp-libs-debuginfobefore 12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.112:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosdhcp-relaybefore 12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.112:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosdhcp-relay-debuginfobefore 12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.112:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1

+94

Same product

isc: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2011-0997dhclient in ISC DHCP 3.0.x through 4.2.x before 4.2.1-P1, 3.1-ESV before 3.1-ESV-R1, and 4.1-ESV before 4.1-ESV-R2 allows remote attackers t
    55Plan
  • CVE-2017-3144Failure to properly clean up closed OMAPI connections can exhaust available sockets
    52Plan
  • CVE-2015-8605ISC DHCP 4.x before 4.1-ESV-R12-P1, 4.2.x, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3-P1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash
    51Plan
  • CVE-2009-0692Stack-based buffer overflow in the script_write_params method in client/dhclient.c in ISC DHCP dhclient 4.1 before 4.1.0p1, 4.0 before 4.0.1
    48Plan
  • CVE-2016-2774ISC DHCP 4.1.x before 4.1-ESV-R13 and 4.2.x and 4.3.x before 4.3.4 does not restrict the number of concurrent TCP sessions, which allows rem
    45Plan
  • CVE-2011-2749The server in ISC DHCP 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.2, 3.1-ESV before 3.1-ESV-R3, and 4.1-ESV before 4.1-ESV-R3 allows remote attackers to cause a
    43Plan

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
alpine:dhcp4.4.2_p1-r0 · Alpine:v3.12Package registry (OSV)
debian:isc-dhcp4.4.1-2.3 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:dhcp4.3.6.P1-lp152.8.6.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:dhclient12:4.2.5-83.el7_9.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:dhcp12:4.2.5-83.el7_9.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:dhcp-client12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:dhcp-client-debuginfo12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:dhcp-common12:4.2.5-83.el7_9.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:dhcp-debuginfo12:4.2.5-83.el7_9.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:dhcp-debugsource12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:dhcp-devel12:4.2.5-83.el7_9.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:dhcp-libs12:4.2.5-83.el7_9.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:dhcp-libs-debuginfo12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:dhcp-relay12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:dhcp-relay-debuginfo12:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
rocky linux:dhcp2:4.3.6-44.el8_4.1 · Rocky Linux:8Package registry (OSV)
suse:dhcp4.2.4.P2-0.28.12.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11 SP3Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

  • Jon FranklinDell and Pawel Wieczorkiewicz from Amazon Web Services for (independently) reporting this vulnerability.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted

Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).

Attack vector
Adjacent
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-secondary

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records