CVE-2011-0997: dhclient in ISC DHCP 3.0.x through 4.2.x before 4.2.1-P1, 3.1-ESV before 3.1-ESV-R1, and 4.1-ESV before 4.1-ESV-R2 allows remote attackers…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 55/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 84.5% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99.7% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: isc-dhcp (Debian:12) 4.1.1-P1-16.1; dhcp3 (Debian:5.0) 3.1.1-6+lenny5; isc-dhcp (Debian:6.0) 4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze2.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to isc-dhcp (Debian:12) 4.1.1-P1-16.1; dhcp3 (Debian:5.0) 3.1.1-6+lenny5; isc-dhcp (Debian:6.0) 4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
dhclient in ISC DHCP 3.0.x through 4.2.x before 4.2.1-P1, 3.1-ESV before 3.1-ESV-R1, and 4.1-ESV before 4.1-ESV-R2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in a hostname obtained from a DHCP message, as demonstrated by a hostname that is provided to dhclient-script.
- Published
- Apr 8, 2011
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 84.5% · 99th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
55
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 25 / 30 · 84.5%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| isc | dhcp | cpe:2.3:a:isc:dhcp |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- canonical ubuntu linux10.04
- canonical ubuntu linux10.10
- canonical ubuntu linux6.06
- canonical ubuntu linux8.04
- canonical ubuntu linux9.10
- debian debian linux5.0
- debian debian linux6.0
- debian debian linux7.0
+12 more rows
- isc dhcp3.0
- isc dhcp3.0.1
- isc dhcp3.0.2
- isc dhcp3.0.3
- isc dhcp3.0.4
- isc dhcp3.0.5
- isc dhcp3.0.6
- isc dhcp3.1-esv
- isc dhcp3.1.0
- isc dhcp3.1.1
- isc dhcp3.1.2
- isc dhcp3.1.3
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | isc-dhcp | before 4.1.1-P1-16.1 | 4.1.1-P1-16.1 |
| Debian:5.0 | dhcp3 | before 3.1.1-6+lenny5 | 3.1.1-6+lenny5 |
| Debian:6.0 | isc-dhcp | before 4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze2 | 4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze2 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | dhcp | before 4.3.3.P1-3.1 | 4.3.3.P1-3.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | dhclient | before 7:3.0.1-67.el4 | 7:3.0.1-67.el4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | dhcp | before 7:3.0.1-67.el4 | 7:3.0.1-67.el4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | dhcp-debuginfo | before 7:3.0.1-67.el4 | 7:3.0.1-67.el4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | dhcp-devel | before 7:3.0.1-67.el4 | 7:3.0.1-67.el4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | dhclient | before 12:3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 | 12:3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | dhcp | before 12:3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 | 12:3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | dhcp-debuginfo | before 12:3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 | 12:3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | dhcp-devel | before 12:3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 | 12:3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | libdhcp4client | before 12:3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 | 12:3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | libdhcp4client-devel | before 12:3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 | 12:3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | dhclient | before 12:4.1.1-12.P1.el6_0.4 | 12:4.1.1-12.P1.el6_0.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | dhcp | before 12:4.1.1-12.P1.el6_0.4 | 12:4.1.1-12.P1.el6_0.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | dhcp-debuginfo | before 12:4.1.1-12.P1.el6_0.4 | 12:4.1.1-12.P1.el6_0.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | dhcp-devel | before 12:4.1.1-12.P1.el6_0.4 | 12:4.1.1-12.P1.el6_0.4 |
| Red Hat:rhel_els:3::as | dhclient | before 7:3.0.1-10.3_EL3 | 7:3.0.1-10.3_EL3 |
| Red Hat:rhel_els:3::as | dhcp | before 7:3.0.1-10.3_EL3 | 7:3.0.1-10.3_EL3 |
| Red Hat:rhel_els:3::as | dhcp-debuginfo | before 7:3.0.1-10.3_EL3 | 7:3.0.1-10.3_EL3 |
| Red Hat:rhel_els:3::as | dhcp-devel | before 7:3.0.1-10.3_EL3 | 7:3.0.1-10.3_EL3 |
Same product
isc: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-3144Failure to properly clean up closed OMAPI connections can exhaust available sockets52Plan
- CVE-2015-8605ISC DHCP 4.x before 4.1-ESV-R12-P1, 4.2.x, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3-P1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application…51Plan
- CVE-2009-0692Stack-based buffer overflow in the script_write_params method in client/dhclient.c in ISC DHCP dhclient 4.1 before 4.1.0p1, 4.0 before…48Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2010-3616Dec 17, 2010 · ISC DHCP server 4.2 before 4.2.0-P2, when configured to use failover partnerships, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service…22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2011-0413Jan 31, 2011 · The DHCPv6 server in ISC DHCP 4.0.x and 4.1.x before 4.1.2-P1, 4.0-ESV and 4.1-ESV before 4.1-ESV-R1, and 4.2.x before 4.2.1b1 allows…41Plan
- Later →CVE-2011-2748Aug 15, 2011 · The server in ISC DHCP 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.2, 3.1-ESV before 3.1-ESV-R3, and 4.1-ESV before 4.1-ESV-R3 allows remote attackers to cause…43Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:dhcp3 | 3.1.1-6+lenny5 · Debian:5.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:isc-dhcp | 4.1.1-P1-16.1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:dhcp | 4.3.3.P1-3.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dhclient | 7:3.0.1-67.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dhcp | 7:3.0.1-67.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dhcp-debuginfo | 7:3.0.1-67.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dhcp-devel | 7:3.0.1-67.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libdhcp4client | 12:3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libdhcp4client-devel | 12:3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-April/057888.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-April/058279.html
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133226187115472&w=2
- secunia.com/advisories/44037
- secunia.com/advisories/44048
- secunia.com/advisories/44089
- secunia.com/advisories/44090
- secunia.com/advisories/44103
- secunia.com/advisories/44127
- secunia.com/advisories/44180
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201301-06.xml
- securitytracker.com/id?1025300
- slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2011&m=slackware-security.593345
- www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2216
- www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2217
- www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/107886
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:073
- www.osvdb.org/71493
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0428.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.