Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA isc

CVE-2020-8625: A vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Plan (action score 51/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 64.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99.2% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
  • Fixed version: bind (Alpine:v3.10) 9.16.11-r2; bind9 (Debian:10) 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u3; bind9 (Debian:12) 1:9.16.12-1.
  • Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).

Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to bind (Alpine:v3.10) 9.16.11-r2; bind9 (Debian:10) 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u3; bind9 (Debian:12) 1:9.16.12-1 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting valid values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credentialconfiguration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. The most likely outcome of a successful exploitation of the vulnerability is a crash of the named process. However, remote code execution, while unproven, is theoretically possible. Affects: BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.27, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.11, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.27-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.11-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition. Also release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch

HighCVSS 8.1 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Feb 17, 2021
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
64.1% · 99th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

51

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS
32 / 40 · 8.1 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
19 / 30 · 64.1%

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
8.1
CNA · isc
8.1
agree

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2020-8625

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
iscbind
debiandebian linux
fedoraprojectfedora
siemenssinec infrastructure network services
netappcloud backup
netappa250 firmware
netappa250
netapp500f firmware
netapp500f

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • debian debian linux10.0
  • debian debian linux9.0
  • fedoraproject fedora32
  • fedoraproject fedora33
  • fedoraproject fedora34
  • isc bind9.5.0 and later · up to 9.11.27 inclusive
  • isc bind9.12.0 and later · up to 9.16.11 inclusive
  • isc bind9.11.21
  • isc bind9.11.27
  • isc bind9.11.3
  • isc bind9.11.5
  • isc bind9.11.6
  • isc bind9.11.7
  • isc bind9.11.8
  • isc bind9.16.11
  • isc bind9.16.8
  • isc bind9.17.0
  • isc bind9.17.1
  • netapp 500f firmwareall versions
  • netapp a250 firmwareall versions

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (isc). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • ISC BIND9

    • Open Source Branches 9.5 though 9.11 9.5.0 through versions before 9.11.28, Open Source Branches 9.12 though 9.16 9.12.0 through versions before 9.16.12, Supported Preview Branch 9.11-S 9.11.3-S1 through versions before 9.11.28-S1, Supported Preview Branch 9.16-S 9.16.8-S1 through versions before 9.16.12-S1, Development Branch 9.17 9.17.0 through versions before 9.17.2affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Alpine:v3.10bindfrom 9.5.0 · before 9.16.11-r29.16.11-r2
Debian:10bind9before 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u31:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u3
Debian:12bind9before 1:9.16.12-11:9.16.12-1
Debian:9bind9before 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u81:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u8
openSUSE:Leap 15.2bindbefore 9.16.6-lp152.14.12.19.16.6-lp152.14.12.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbindbefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-chrootbefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-debuginfobefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-develbefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-export-develbefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-export-libsbefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-libsbefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-libs-litebefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-licensebefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-lite-develbefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-pkcs11before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-pkcs11-develbefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-pkcs11-libsbefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-pkcs11-utilsbefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-sdbbefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-sdb-chrootbefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-utilsbefore 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.432:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreambindbefore 32:9.11.20-5.el8_3.132:9.11.20-5.el8_3.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreambind-chrootbefore 32:9.11.20-5.el8_3.132:9.11.20-5.el8_3.1

+96

Same product

isc: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2015-5477named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.7-P2 and 9.10.x before 9.10.2-P3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (REQUIRE assertion faKEV
    90Now
  • CVE-2020-8617A logic error in code which checks TSIG validity can be used to trigger an assertion failure in tsig.c
    60This week
  • CVE-2016-2776buffer.c in named in ISC BIND 9 before 9.9.9-P3, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P3, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0rc3 does not properly construct responses,
    60This week

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2020-8623Aug 21, 2020 · A flaw in native PKCS#11 code can lead to a remotely triggerable assertion failure in pk11.c
    32Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2020-8624Aug 21, 2020 · update-policy rules of type "subdomain" are enforced incorrectly
    18Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2021-25214Apr 28, 2021 · A broken inbound incremental zone update (IXFR) can cause named to terminate unexpectedly
    28Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
alpine:bind9.16.11-r2 · Alpine:v3.10Package registry (OSV)
debian:bind91:9.16.12-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:bind9.16.6-lp152.14.12.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:bind32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:bind-chroot32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:bind-debuginfo32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:bind-debugsource32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:bind-devel32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:bind-export-libs-debuginfo32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:bind-libs32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:bind-libs-debuginfo32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:bind-libs-lite32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:bind-libs-lite-debuginfo32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:bind-license32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:bind-lite-devel32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
suse:bind9.11.22-3.29.1 · SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 9Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)

Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.

All national notices →

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

When data is copied, the source length is not compared with the size of the destination buffer. Excess data overwrites adjacent memory.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

c
char buf[256];memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);

Fixed

c
char buf[256];if (pkt->len > sizeof(buf)) {  return -EINVAL;}memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records