CVE-2020-8625: A vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 51/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 64.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99.2% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: bind (Alpine:v3.10) 9.16.11-r2; bind9 (Debian:10) 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u3; bind9 (Debian:12) 1:9.16.12-1.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to bind (Alpine:v3.10) 9.16.11-r2; bind9 (Debian:10) 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u3; bind9 (Debian:12) 1:9.16.12-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting valid values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credentialconfiguration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. The most likely outcome of a successful exploitation of the vulnerability is a crash of the named process. However, remote code execution, while unproven, is theoretically possible. Affects: BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.27, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.11, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.27-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.11-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition. Also release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch
- Published
- Feb 17, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 64.1% · 99th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-120
Report tools
Action score
51
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 32 / 40 · 8.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 19 / 30 · 64.1%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.1
- CNA · isc
- 8.1
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| isc | bind | cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
| siemens | sinec infrastructure network services | cpe:2.3:a:siemens:sinec_infrastructure_network_services |
| netapp | cloud backup | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:cloud_backup |
| netapp | a250 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netapp:a250_firmware |
| netapp | a250 | cpe:2.3:h:netapp:a250 |
| netapp | 500f firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netapp:500f_firmware |
| netapp | 500f | cpe:2.3:h:netapp:500f |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- debian debian linux10.0
- debian debian linux9.0
- fedoraproject fedora32
- fedoraproject fedora33
- fedoraproject fedora34
- isc bind9.5.0 and later · up to 9.11.27 inclusive
- isc bind9.12.0 and later · up to 9.16.11 inclusive
- isc bind9.11.21
- isc bind9.11.27
- isc bind9.11.3
- isc bind9.11.5
- isc bind9.11.6
- isc bind9.11.7
- isc bind9.11.8
- isc bind9.16.11
- isc bind9.16.8
- isc bind9.17.0
- isc bind9.17.1
- netapp 500f firmwareall versions
- netapp a250 firmwareall versions
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (isc). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
ISC BIND9
- Open Source Branches 9.5 though 9.11 9.5.0 through versions before 9.11.28, Open Source Branches 9.12 though 9.16 9.12.0 through versions before 9.16.12, Supported Preview Branch 9.11-S 9.11.3-S1 through versions before 9.11.28-S1, Supported Preview Branch 9.16-S 9.16.8-S1 through versions before 9.16.12-S1, Development Branch 9.17 9.17.0 through versions before 9.17.2affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.10 | bind | from 9.5.0 · before 9.16.11-r2 | 9.16.11-r2 |
| Debian:10 | bind9 | before 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u3 | 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u3 |
| Debian:12 | bind9 | before 1:9.16.12-1 | 1:9.16.12-1 |
| Debian:9 | bind9 | before 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u8 | 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u8 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.2 | bind | before 9.16.6-lp152.14.12.1 | 9.16.6-lp152.14.12.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-chroot | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-debuginfo | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-devel | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-export-devel | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-export-libs | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-libs | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-libs-lite | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-license | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-lite-devel | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-pkcs11 | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-pkcs11-devel | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-pkcs11-libs | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-pkcs11-utils | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-sdb | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-sdb-chroot | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-utils | before 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | bind | before 32:9.11.20-5.el8_3.1 | 32:9.11.20-5.el8_3.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | bind-chroot | before 32:9.11.20-5.el8_3.1 | 32:9.11.20-5.el8_3.1 |
+96
Same product
isc: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2015-5477named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.7-P2 and 9.10.x before 9.10.2-P3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (REQUIRE assertion faKEV90Now
- CVE-2020-8617A logic error in code which checks TSIG validity can be used to trigger an assertion failure in tsig.c60This week
- CVE-2016-2776buffer.c in named in ISC BIND 9 before 9.9.9-P3, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P3, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0rc3 does not properly construct responses,60This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-8623Aug 21, 2020 · A flaw in native PKCS#11 code can lead to a remotely triggerable assertion failure in pk11.c32Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-8624Aug 21, 2020 · update-policy rules of type "subdomain" are enforced incorrectly18Monitor
- Later →CVE-2021-25214Apr 28, 2021 · A broken inbound incremental zone update (IXFR) can cause named to terminate unexpectedly28Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:bind | 9.16.11-r2 · Alpine:v3.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:bind9 | 1:9.16.12-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:bind | 9.16.6-lp152.14.12.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-chroot | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-debuginfo | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-debugsource | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-devel | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-export-libs-debuginfo | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-libs | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-libs-debuginfo | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-libs-lite | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-libs-lite-debuginfo | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-license | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-lite-devel | 32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.4 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.1::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:bind | 9.11.22-3.29.1 · SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 9 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-22-0215 · Mar 11, 2022(Siemens Güvenlik Bildirimi)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-120 · Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
When data is copied, the source length is not compared with the size of the destination buffer. Excess data overwrites adjacent memory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-120 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
char buf[256];
memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Fixed
char buf[256];
if (pkt->len > sizeof(buf)) {
return -EINVAL;
}
memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Variables and TagsCAPEC-46likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (10 more)Show less
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/20/2
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
- kb.isc.org/v1/docs/cve-2020-8625
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/02/msg00029.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EBTPWRQWRQEJNWY4NHO4WLS4KLJ3ERHZ/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KYXAF7G45RXDVNUTWWCI2CVTHRZ67LST/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QWCMBOSZOJIIET7BWTRYS3HLX5TSDKHX/
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210319-0001/
- www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4857
- www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-21-195/
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.