CVE-2020-3315: Multiple Cisco Products Snort HTTP Detection Engine File Policy Bypass Vulnerability
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 82.5% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: snort (Debian:10) 2.9.20-0+deb10u1; snort (Debian:11) 2.9.20-0+deb11u1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to snort (Debian:10) 2.9.20-0+deb10u1; snort (Debian:11) 2.9.20-0+deb11u1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the configured file policies on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to errors in how the Snort detection engine handles specific HTTP responses. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets that would flow through an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the configured file policies and deliver a malicious payload to the protected network.
- Published
- May 6, 2020
- Updated
- Aug 11, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.2% · 82th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-693
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.3
- CNA · cisco
- 5.8
- 0.5 point gap
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| cisco | secure firewall management center | cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_firewall_management_center |
| cisco | secure firewall threat defense | cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_firewall_threat_defense |
| cisco | ios | cpe:2.3:a:cisco:ios |
| cisco | 1100-4g integrated services router | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1100-4g_integrated_services_router |
| cisco | 1100-6g integrated services router | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1100-6g_integrated_services_router |
| cisco | 1100-lte integrated services router | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1100-lte_integrated_services_router |
| cisco | 1101 integrated services router | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1101_integrated_services_router |
| cisco | 1109 integrated services router | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1109_integrated_services_router |
| cisco | 1111x integrated services router | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1111x_integrated_services_router |
| cisco | 111x integrated services router | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:111x_integrated_services_router |
| cisco | 1120 integrated services router | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1120_integrated_services_router |
| cisco | 1160 integrated services router | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1160_integrated_services_router |
and 7 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- cisco ios15.2(7)e
- cisco ios16.11.2
- cisco ios17.3.1
- cisco secure firewall management center2.9.14.4
- cisco secure firewall management center2.9.15
- cisco secure firewall management center2.9.16
- cisco secure firewall threat defensebefore 6.6.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (cisco). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Cisco Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software
- n/aaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:10 | snort | before 2.9.20-0+deb10u1 | 2.9.20-0+deb10u1 |
| Debian:11 | snort | before 2.9.20-0+deb11u1 | 2.9.20-0+deb11u1 |
Same product
cisco: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-20079Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Authentication Bypass Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityKEV97Now
- CVE-2026-20131Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Software Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityKEV83Now
- CVE-2026-20316Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Software Static Credential VulnerabilityKEV62This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-3312May 6, 2020 · Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software Information Disclosure Vulnerability30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-3313May 6, 2020 · Cisco Firepower Management Center Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability24Monitor
- Later →CVE-2020-3318May 6, 2020 · Cisco Firepower Management Center Static Credential Vulnerabilities39Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:snort | 2.9.20-0+deb10u1 · Debian:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-693 · Protection Mechanism FailureCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLsCAPEC-1likelihood: High · High
- Cross Site TracingCAPEC-107likelihood: Medium · Very High
- Directory IndexingCAPEC-127likelihood: High · Medium
- Using Malicious FilesCAPEC-17likelihood: High · Very High
- Encryption Brute ForcingCAPEC-20likelihood: Low · Low
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- Escaping a Sandbox by Calling Code in Another LanguageCAPEC-237likelihood: Low · Very High
- Using Unpublished Interfaces or FunctionalityCAPEC-36likelihood: Medium · High
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.