Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA cisco

CVE-2026-20131: Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Software Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Now (action score 83/100)

  • CISA has confirmed exploitation in the wild (Mar 19, 2026); it is known to be used in ransomware campaigns. Remediation deadline for US federal agencies: Mar 22, 2026.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 43.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 98.7% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
  • According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.

Patch today or shut off access. Until a fix is released, restrict access to the affected component and follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · CISA KEV · FIRST EPSS

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary Java code as root on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insecure deserialization of a user-supplied Java byte stream. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted serialized Java object to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device and elevate privileges to root. Note: If the FMC management interface does not have public internet access, the attack surface that is associated with this vulnerability is reduced.

CriticalCVSS 10.0 · v3.1KEVWeaponized No fix recorded
Published
Mar 4, 2026
Updated
Aug 14, 2026
EPSS
43.1% · 98th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

83

Now

Patch today or shut off access.

CVSS
40 / 40 · 10.0 / 10
CISA KEV
30 / 30 · Listed
EPSS
13 / 30 · 43.1%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
active
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · cisco
10.0
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Actively exploited in the wild

CISA added this to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on Mar 19, 2026. That signals real attacks, not theory.

Remediation deadline for US federal agencies: Mar 22, 2026.

Known to be used in ransomware campaigns.

Get told when this record changes

  • In CISA KEV: exploitation in the wild confirmed
  • Weaponized exploit exists
  • No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-20131

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
ciscosecure firewall management center

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • cisco secure firewall management center10.0.0
  • cisco secure firewall management center6.4.0.13
  • cisco secure firewall management center6.4.0.14
  • cisco secure firewall management center6.4.0.15
  • cisco secure firewall management center6.4.0.16
  • cisco secure firewall management center6.4.0.17
  • cisco secure firewall management center6.4.0.18
  • cisco secure firewall management center7.0.0
  • cisco secure firewall management center7.0.0.1
  • cisco secure firewall management center7.0.1
  • cisco secure firewall management center7.0.1.1
  • cisco secure firewall management center7.0.2
  • cisco secure firewall management center7.0.2.1
  • cisco secure firewall management center7.0.3
  • cisco secure firewall management center7.0.4
  • cisco secure firewall management center7.0.5
  • cisco secure firewall management center7.0.6
  • cisco secure firewall management center7.0.6.1
  • cisco secure firewall management center7.0.6.2
  • cisco secure firewall management center7.0.6.3

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (cisco). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Cisco Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC)

    • 7.0.0, 7.0.0.1, 7.0.1, 7.1.0, 6.4.0.13, 7.0.1.1, 6.4.0.14, 7.1.0.1, 7.0.2, 6.4.0.15, 7.2.0, 7.0.2.1 … (+28)affected

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-20079Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Authentication Bypass Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityKEV
    97Now
  • CVE-2026-20316Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Software Static Credential VulnerabilityKEV
    62This week
  • CVE-2016-6433The Threat Management Console in Cisco Firepower Management Center 5.2.0 through 6.0.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrar
    59Plan

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-20002Mar 4, 2026 · A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure FMC Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct
    32Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-20003Mar 4, 2026 · A vulnerability in the REST API of Cisco Secure FMC Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks
    19Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-20044Mar 4, 2026 · Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Command Injection Vulnerability
    24Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

Weaponized

A ready exploit tool or active in-the-wild use is known for this vulnerability. This should be your top priority.

Evidence

  • Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×5

Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.

Public exploit evidence
SourceKindDate
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02026-03-06
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:32026-03-11
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:22026-04-07
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02026-05-10
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02026-08-28

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

  1. Published
  2. First PoC+1 d
  3. CISA KEV+14 d
  4. TodayOct 26, 2026+236 d
EPSS, last 120 days+1% in 7 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted

Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-secondary

Root cause

Data received over the network is deserialized into the language’s native object format without verifying its source. Code paths inside the object can be triggered during deserialization.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

python
payload = sock.recv(65536)job = pickle.loads(payload)

Fixed

python
payload = sock.recv(65536)if not hmac.compare_digest(sign(payload), header_sig):    raise PermissionError("invalid signature")job = JobSchema.validate(json.loads(payload))

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

All records