CVE-2019-10222: A flaw was found in the Ceph RGW configuration with Beast as the front end handling client requests.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 4.5% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 91.5% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: ceph (Debian:10) 12.2.11+dfsg1-2.1+deb10u1; ceph (Debian:12) 14.2.4-1; ceph (Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7) 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to ceph (Debian:10) 12.2.11+dfsg1-2.1+deb10u1; ceph (Debian:12) 14.2.4-1; ceph (Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7) 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in the Ceph RGW configuration with Beast as the front end handling client requests. An unauthenticated attacker could crash the Ceph RGW server by sending valid HTTP headers and terminating the connection, resulting in a remote denial of service for Ceph RGW clients.
- Published
- Nov 8, 2019
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 4.5% · 91th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-755
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 4.5%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.5
- CNA · redhat
- 7.5
- agree
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| ceph | ceph | cpe:2.3:a:ceph:ceph |
| redhat | ceph storage | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:ceph_storage |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- ceph cephall versions
- fedoraproject fedora30
- fedoraproject fedora31
- redhat ceph storage3.0
- redhat ceph storage3.3
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
The Ceph Project ceph
- n/aaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:10 | ceph | before 12.2.11+dfsg1-2.1+deb10u1 | 12.2.11+dfsg1-2.1+deb10u1 |
| Debian:12 | ceph | before 14.2.4-1 | 14.2.4-1 |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-base | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-common | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-debuginfo | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-fuse | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-mds | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-mgr | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-mon | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-osd | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-radosgw | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-selinux | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-test | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | libcephfs-devel | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | libcephfs2 | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | librados-devel | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | librados2 | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | libradosstriper1 | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | librbd-devel | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | librbd1 | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | librgw-devel | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | librgw2 | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | python-cephfs | before 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp |
+7
Same product
ceph: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-50152Ceph Monitor subscription handler improperly authorizes config-key store reads, exposing cluster secrets to read-only users36Monitor
- CVE-2025-30156Ceph: AES-CBC misuse in CephX and RADOSGW enables authentication bypass and credential forgery35Monitor
- CVE-2026-39944Ceph: CephX AES Authentication error35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2018-1129Jul 10, 2018 · A flaw was found in the way signature calculation was handled by cephx authentication protocol.27Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2017-7519Jul 27, 2018 · In Ceph, a format string flaw was found in the way libradosstriper parses input from user.17Monitor
- Later →CVE-2020-1700Feb 7, 2020 · A flaw was found in the way the Ceph RGW Beast front-end handles unexpected disconnects.27Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:ceph | 14.2.4-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph-base | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph-common | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph-debuginfo | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph-mgr | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph-mon | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph-selinux | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph-test | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libcephfs-devel | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libcephfs2 | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:librados-devel | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:librados2 | 2:12.2.12-48.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ceph | 14.2.2.349+g6716a1e448-3.9.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ceph-iscsi | 3.3+1570532654.g93940a4-3.7.1 · SUSE:Enterprise Storage 6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ses-manual_en | 6+git145.1558531-3.17.1 · SUSE:Enterprise Storage 6 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-755 · Improper Handling of Exceptional ConditionsCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.