Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2018-5740· NVD / CVE Program· CNA isc

A flaw in the "deny-answer-aliases" feature can cause an assertion failure in named

"deny-answer-aliases" is a little-used feature intended to help recursive server operators protect end users against DNS rebinding attacks, a potential method of circumventing the security model used by client browsers. However, a defect in this feature makes it easy, when the feature is in use, to experience an assertion failure in name.c. Affects BIND 9.7.0->9.8.8, 9.9.0->9.9.13, 9.10.0->9.10.8, 9.11.0->9.11.4, 9.12.0->9.12.2, 9.13.0->9.13.2.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—Proof of concept Fix available
Published
Jan 16, 2019
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
59.6% · 99th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

48

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
18 / 30 · 59.6%

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
7.5
CNA · isc
7.5
agree

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

VendorProduct
iscbind
redhatenterprise linux desktop
redhatenterprise linux server
redhatenterprise linux server aus
redhatenterprise linux server eus
redhatenterprise linux workstation
debiandebian linux
netappdata ontap edge
canonicalubuntu linux
hphp-ux
opensuseleap

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • canonical ubuntu linux12.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux14.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux16.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux18.04
  • debian debian linux8.0
  • debian debian linux9.0
  • hp hp-uxall versions
  • isc bind9.9.0 and later · before 9.9.13
  • isc bind9.11.0 and later · before 9.11.4
  • isc bind9.10.0 and later · before 9.10.8
  • isc bind9.7.0 and later · before 9.8.8
  • isc bind9.13.0 and later · before 9.13.2
  • isc bind9.12.0 and later · before 9.12.2
  • netapp data ontap edgeall versions
  • opensuse leap15.0
  • opensuse leap15.1
  • opensuse leap42.3
  • redhat enterprise linux desktop6.0
  • redhat enterprise linux desktop7.0
  • redhat enterprise linux server6.0

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (isc). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • ISC BIND 9

    • BIND 9 9.7.0->9.8.8, 9.9.0->9.9.13, 9.10.0->9.10.8, 9.11.0->9.11.4, 9.12.0->9.12.2, 9.13.0->9.13.2affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Alpine:v3.10bindfrom 9.7.0 · before 9.12.2_p1-r09.12.2_p1-r0
Alpine:v3.5bindfrom 9.7.0 · before 9.10.8_p1-r09.10.8_p1-r0
Alpine:v3.6bindfrom 9.7.0 · before 9.11.4_p1-r09.11.4_p1-r0
Debian:12bind9before 1:9.11.4.P1+dfsg-11:9.11.4.P1+dfsg-1
Debian:8bind9before 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u161:9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u16
Debian:9bind9before 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u101:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u10
openSUSE:Leap 15.0bindbefore 9.11.2-lp151.11.3.19.11.2-lp151.11.3.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientbindbefore 32:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.132:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientbind-chrootbefore 32:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.132:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientbind-debuginfobefore 32:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.132:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientbind-develbefore 32:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.132:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientbind-libsbefore 32:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.132:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientbind-sdbbefore 32:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.132:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientbind-utilsbefore 32:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.132:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbindbefore 32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.132:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-chrootbefore 32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.132:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-debuginfobefore 32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.132:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-develbefore 32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.132:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-libsbefore 32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.132:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-libs-litebefore 32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.132:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-licensebefore 32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.132:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-lite-develbefore 32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.132:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-pkcs11before 32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.132:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientbind-pkcs11-develbefore 32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.132:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1

+9

Same product

isc: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2015-5477named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.7-P2 and 9.10.x before 9.10.2-P3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (REQUIRE assertion fa
    58Plan
  • CVE-2016-2776buffer.c in named in ISC BIND 9 before 9.9.9-P3, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P3, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0rc3 does not properly construct responses,
    57Plan
  • CVE-2016-1286named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure an
    53Plan
  • CVE-2020-8625A vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack
    51Plan
  • CVE-2020-8617A logic error in code which checks TSIG validity can be used to trigger an assertion failure in tsig.c
    51Plan
  • CVE-2001-0010Buffer overflow in transaction signature (TSIG) handling code in BIND 8 allows remote attackers to gain root privileges.
    49Plan

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Alpine:bind9.12.2_p1-r0 · Alpine:v3.10Package registry (OSV)
Debian:bind91:9.11.4.P1+dfsg-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
openSUSE:bind9.11.2-lp151.11.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.0Package registry (OSV)
Red Hat:bind32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:bind-chroot32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:bind-debuginfo32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:bind-devel32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:bind-libs32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:bind-libs-lite32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:bind-license32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:bind-lite-devel32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:bind-pkcs1132:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:bind-pkcs11-devel32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:bind-pkcs11-libs32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:bind-utils32:9.9.4-61.el7_5.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
SUSE:bind9.11.2-12.11.2 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

Proof of concept available

A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.

Evidence

  • Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1

Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.

Public exploit evidence
SourceKindDate
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:32018-08-15

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

  1. First PoC-155 d
  2. Published
  3. TodaySep 29, 2026+2813 d
EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-617 · Reachable Assertion

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records