CVE-2017-3137: A response packet can cause a resolver to terminate when processing an answer containing a CNAME or DNAME
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 33/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 8.9% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 95.3% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: bind (Alpine:v3.10) 9.11.0_p5-r0; bind (Alpine:v3.2) 9.10.4_p8; bind (Alpine:v3.3) 9.10.4_p8-r0.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to bind (Alpine:v3.10) 9.11.0_p5-r0; bind (Alpine:v3.2) 9.10.4_p8; bind (Alpine:v3.3) 9.10.4_p8-r0 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Mistaken assumptions about the ordering of records in the answer section of a response containing CNAME or DNAME resource records could lead to a situation in which named would exit with an assertion failure when processing a response in which records occurred in an unusual order. Affects BIND 9.9.9-P6, 9.9.10b1->9.9.10rc1, 9.10.4-P6, 9.10.5b1->9.10.5rc1, 9.11.0-P3, 9.11.1b1->9.11.1rc1, and 9.9.9-S8.
- Published
- Jan 16, 2019
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 8.9% · 95th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-617
Report tools
Action score
33
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 3 / 30 · 8.9%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.5
- CNA · isc
- 7.5
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| isc | bind | cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind |
| redhat | enterprise linux desktop | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop |
| redhat | enterprise linux server | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server |
| redhat | enterprise linux server aus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_aus |
| redhat | enterprise linux server eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux server tus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_tus |
| redhat | enterprise linux workstation | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation |
| netapp | data ontap edge | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:data_ontap_edge |
| netapp | element software | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:element_software |
| netapp | oncommand balance | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:oncommand_balance |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (isc). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
ISC BIND 9
- 9.9.9-P6, 9.9.10b1->9.9.10rc1, 9.10.4-P6, 9.10.5b1->9.10.5rc1, 9.11.0-P3, 9.11.1b1->9.11.1rc1, and 9.9.9-S8affected
Affected versions · NVD (20)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- debian debian linux8.0
- isc bind9.10.4
- isc bind9.10.5
- isc bind9.11.0
- isc bind9.11.1
- isc bind9.9.10
- isc bind9.9.9
- netapp data ontap edgeall versions
- netapp element softwareall versions
- netapp oncommand balanceall versions
- redhat enterprise linux desktop6.0
- redhat enterprise linux desktop7.0
- redhat enterprise linux server6.0
- redhat enterprise linux server7.0
- redhat enterprise linux server aus6.2
- redhat enterprise linux server aus6.4
- redhat enterprise linux server aus6.5
- redhat enterprise linux server aus6.6
- redhat enterprise linux server aus7.2
- redhat enterprise linux server aus7.3
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.10 | bind | before 9.11.0_p5-r0 | 9.11.0_p5-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.2 | bind | before 9.10.4_p8 | 9.10.4_p8 |
| Alpine:v3.3 | bind | before 9.10.4_p8-r0 | 9.10.4_p8-r0 |
| Debian:12 | bind9 | before 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3 | 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3 |
| Debian:7 | bind9 | before 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u16 | 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u16 |
| Debian:8 | bind9 | before 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u11 | 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u11 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind | before 32:9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1 | 32:9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-chroot | before 32:9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1 | 32:9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-debuginfo | before 32:9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1 | 32:9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-devel | before 32:9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1 | 32:9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-libs | before 32:9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1 | 32:9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-sdb | before 32:9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1 | 32:9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-utils | before 32:9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1 | 32:9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind | before 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-chroot | before 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-debuginfo | before 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-devel | before 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-libs | before 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-libs-lite | before 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-license | before 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-lite-devel | before 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-pkcs11 | before 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-pkcs11-devel | before 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-pkcs11-libs | before 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 |
+58
Same product
isc: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2015-5477named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.7-P2 and 9.10.x before 9.10.2-P3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (REQUIRE assertion…KEV90Now
- CVE-2020-8617A logic error in code which checks TSIG validity can be used to trigger an assertion failure in tsig.c60This week
- CVE-2016-2776buffer.c in named in ISC BIND 9 before 9.9.9-P3, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P3, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0rc3 does not properly construct…60This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2017-3135Jan 16, 2019 · Combination of DNS64 and RPZ Can Lead to Crash28Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2017-3136Jan 16, 2019 · An error handling synthesized records could cause an assertion failure when using DNS64 with "break-dnssec yes;"26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2017-3138Jan 16, 2019 · named exits with a REQUIRE assertion failure if it receives a null command string on its control channel23Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:bind | 9.11.0_p5-r0 · Alpine:v3.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:bind9 | 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-chroot | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-debuginfo | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-devel | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-libs | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-libs-lite | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-license | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-lite-devel | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-pkcs11 | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-pkcs11-devel | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-pkcs11-libs | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-utils | 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:bind | 9.9.9P1-59.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-617 · Reachable AssertionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (10 more)Show less
- www.securitytracker.com/id/1038258
- www.securitytracker.com/id/1040195
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1095
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1105
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1582
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1583
- kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01466
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/201708-01
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180802-0002/
- www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3854
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.