CVE-2016-6170: ISC BIND through 9.9.9-P1, 9.10.x through 9.10.4-P1, and 9.11.x through 9.11.0b1 allows primary DNS servers to cause a denial of service…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 38/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 40.9% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 98.6% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: bind9 (Debian:12) 1:9.10.6+dfsg-1; bind (SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1) 9.9.9P1-59.1; bind (SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12) 9.9.9P1-28.34.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to bind9 (Debian:12) 1:9.10.6+dfsg-1; bind (SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1) 9.9.9P1-59.1; bind (SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12) 9.9.9P1-28.34.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
ISC BIND through 9.9.9-P1, 9.10.x through 9.10.4-P1, and 9.11.x through 9.11.0b1 allows primary DNS servers to cause a denial of service (secondary DNS server crash) via a large AXFR response, and possibly allows IXFR servers to cause a denial of service (IXFR client crash) via a large IXFR response and allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (primary DNS server crash) via a large UPDATE message.
- Published
- Jul 6, 2016
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 40.9% · 98th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
38
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 12 / 30 · 40.9%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- isc bind9.10.0 and later · up to 9.10.3 inclusive
- isc bind9.0 and later · up to 9.9.8 inclusive
- isc bind9.10.4
- isc bind9.11.0
- isc bind9.9.9
- redhat enterprise linux5.0
- redhat enterprise linux6.0
- redhat enterprise linux7.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | bind9 | before 1:9.10.6+dfsg-1 | 1:9.10.6+dfsg-1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1 | bind | before 9.9.9P1-59.1 | 9.9.9P1-59.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 | bind | before 9.9.9P1-28.34.1 | 9.9.9P1-28.34.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4 | bind | before 9.9.6P1-0.44.1 | 9.9.6P1-0.44.1 |
Same product
isc: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2015-5477named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.7-P2 and 9.10.x before 9.10.2-P3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (REQUIRE assertion…KEV90Now
- CVE-2020-8617A logic error in code which checks TSIG validity can be used to trigger an assertion failure in tsig.c60This week
- CVE-2016-2776buffer.c in named in ISC BIND 9 before 9.9.9-P3, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P3, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0rc3 does not properly construct…60This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2016-1286Mar 9, 2016 · named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure…52Plan
- ← EarlierCVE-2016-2088Mar 9, 2016 · resolver.c in named in ISC BIND 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4, when DNS cookies are enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service…34Monitor
- Later →CVE-2016-2775Jul 19, 2016 · ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.9-P2, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P2, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0b2, when lwresd or the named lwres option is enabled, allows…42Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:bind9 | 1:9.10.6+dfsg-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:bind | 9.9.9P1-59.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (9 more)Show less
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/91611
- www.securitytracker.com/id/1036241
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353563
- kb.isc.org/article/AA-01390
- kb.isc.org/article/AA-01390/169/CVE-2016-6170
- lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2016-July/015058.html
- lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2016-July/015073.html
- lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2016-July/015075.html
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/201610-07
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.