CVE-2016-3632: The _TIFFVGetField function in tif_dirinfo.c in LibTIFF 4.0.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 32/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 3.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 88.5% of all records.
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: tiff (Debian:12) 4.0.6-3; tiff (Debian:7) 4.0.2-6+deb7u7; libtiff (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:3.9.4-18.el6_8.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to tiff (Debian:12) 4.0.6-3; tiff (Debian:7) 4.0.2-6+deb7u7; libtiff (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:3.9.4-18.el6_8 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The _TIFFVGetField function in tif_dirinfo.c in LibTIFF 4.0.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted TIFF image.
- Published
- Sep 21, 2016
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.2% · 88th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-787
Report tools
Action score
32
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.2%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- libtiff libtiffup to 4.0.6 inclusive
- oracle vm server3.3
- oracle vm server3.4
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | tiff | before 4.0.6-3 | 4.0.6-3 |
| Debian:7 | tiff | before 4.0.2-6+deb7u7 | 4.0.2-6+deb7u7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libtiff | before 0:3.9.4-18.el6_8 | 0:3.9.4-18.el6_8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libtiff-debuginfo | before 0:3.9.4-18.el6_8 | 0:3.9.4-18.el6_8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libtiff-devel | before 0:3.9.4-18.el6_8 | 0:3.9.4-18.el6_8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libtiff-static | before 0:3.9.4-18.el6_8 | 0:3.9.4-18.el6_8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libtiff | before 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 | 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libtiff-debuginfo | before 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 | 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libtiff-devel | before 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 | 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libtiff-static | before 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 | 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libtiff-tools | before 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 | 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP3 | tiff | before 4.0.9-44.15.2 | 4.0.9-44.15.2 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4 | tiff | before 3.8.2-141.169.9.1 | 3.8.2-141.169.9.1 |
Same product
libtiff: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2006-3459Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the TIFF library (libtiff) before 3.8.2, as used in Adobe Reader 9.3.0 and other products, allow…47Plan
- CVE-2004-1308Integer overflow in (1) tif_dirread.c and (2) tif_fax3.c for libtiff 3.5.7 and 3.7.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via…44Plan
- CVE-2015-8668Heap-based buffer overflow in the PackBitsPreEncode function in tif_packbits.c in bmp2tiff in libtiff 4.0.6 and earlier allows remote…43Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2015-8784Apr 13, 2016 · The NeXTDecode function in tif_next.c in LibTIFF allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write) via a crafted…27Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2016-3186Apr 19, 2016 · Buffer overflow in the readextension function in gif2tiff.c in LibTIFF 4.0.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service…25Monitor
- Later →CVE-2016-3945Sep 21, 2016 · Multiple integer overflows in the (1) cvt_by_strip and (2) cvt_by_tile functions in the tiff2rgba tool in LibTIFF 4.0.6 and earlier, when…32Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:tiff | 4.0.6-3 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libtiff | 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libtiff-debuginfo | 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libtiff-devel | 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libtiff-static | 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libtiff-tools | 0:4.0.3-25.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:tiff | 4.0.9-44.15.2 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds WriteCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (9 more)Show less
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1546.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1547.html
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/08/9
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjul2016-3090544.html
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinjul2016-3090546.html
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/85953
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/85960
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325095
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-16
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.