CVE-2016-1285: named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 does not properly handle DNAME records when parsing fetch reply messages…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 44/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 57.8% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: bind9 (Debian:12) 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6; bind9 (Debian:7) 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u10; bind9 (Debian:8) 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u6.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to bind9 (Debian:12) 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6; bind9 (Debian:7) 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u10; bind9 (Debian:8) 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 does not properly handle DNAME records when parsing fetch reply messages, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a malformed packet to the rndc (aka control channel) interface, related to alist.c and sexpr.c.
- Published
- Mar 9, 2016
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 57.8% · 99th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
44
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 27 / 40 · 6.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 17 / 30 · 57.8%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| isc | bind | cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind |
| suse | linux enterprise debuginfo | cpe:2.3:a:suse:linux_enterprise_debuginfo |
| suse | manager | cpe:2.3:a:suse:manager |
| suse | manager proxy | cpe:2.3:a:suse:manager_proxy |
| suse | openstack cloud | cpe:2.3:a:suse:openstack_cloud |
| opensuse | leap | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:leap |
| opensuse | opensuse | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:opensuse |
| suse | linux enterprise desktop | cpe:2.3:o:suse:linux_enterprise_desktop |
| suse | linux enterprise server | cpe:2.3:o:suse:linux_enterprise_server |
| suse | linux enterprise software development kit | cpe:2.3:o:suse:linux_enterprise_software_development_kit |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
and 35 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- canonical ubuntu linux12.04
- canonical ubuntu linux14.04
- canonical ubuntu linux15.10
- debian debian linux7.0
- debian debian linux8.0
- debian debian linux9.0
- fedoraproject fedora22
- fedoraproject fedora23
+12 more rows
- fedoraproject fedora24
- isc bind9.0.0 and later · before 9.9.8
- isc bind9.10.0 and later · before 9.10.3
- isc bind9.10.3
- isc bind9.9.8
- juniper junos12.1x46
- juniper junos12.1x46-d10
- juniper junos12.1x46-d76
- juniper junos12.3x48
- juniper junos15.1x49
- juniper junos17.3
- juniper junos17.4
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | bind9 | before 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6 | 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6 |
| Debian:7 | bind9 | before 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u10 | 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u10 |
| Debian:8 | bind9 | before 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u6 | 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | bind | before 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | bind-debuginfo | before 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | bind-libs | before 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | bind-sdb | before 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | bind-utils | before 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | bind-chroot | before 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | bind-devel | before 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | bind-libbind-devel | before 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | caching-nameserver | before 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | bind97 | before 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 | 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | bind97-chroot | before 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 | 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | bind97-debuginfo | before 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 | 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | bind97-devel | before 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 | 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | bind97-libs | before 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 | 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | bind97-utils | before 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 | 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind | before 32:9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.7 | 32:9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-chroot | before 32:9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.7 | 32:9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-debuginfo | before 32:9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.7 | 32:9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-devel | before 32:9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.7 | 32:9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-libs | before 32:9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.7 | 32:9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-sdb | before 32:9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.7 | 32:9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.7 |
+48
Same product
isc: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2015-5477named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.7-P2 and 9.10.x before 9.10.2-P3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (REQUIRE assertion…KEV90Now
- CVE-2020-8617A logic error in code which checks TSIG validity can be used to trigger an assertion failure in tsig.c60This week
- CVE-2016-2776buffer.c in named in ISC BIND 9 before 9.9.9-P3, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P3, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0rc3 does not properly construct…60This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2015-8705Jan 20, 2016 · buffer.c in named in ISC BIND 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P3, when debug logging is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service…30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2016-1284Feb 4, 2016 · rdataset.c in ISC BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition 9.9.8-S before 9.9.8-S5, when nxdomain-redirect is enabled, allows remote attackers to…24Monitor
- Later →CVE-2016-1286Mar 9, 2016 · named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure…52Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:bind9 | 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-chroot | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-debuginfo | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-libs | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-sdb | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-utils | 30:9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind97 | 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind97-chroot | 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind97-debuginfo | 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind97-devel | 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind97-libs | 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind97-utils | 32:9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:bind | 9.9.6P1-38.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/181037.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/178831.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/178880.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/179904.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/179911.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00046.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00053.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00070.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00072.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00075.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00079.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00084.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg00013.html
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=146191105921542&w=2
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0562.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0601.html
- www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3511
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjan2016-2867206.html
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjan2016-2867209.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.