named in ISC BIND 9.7.0 through 9.9.6 before 9.9.6-P2 and 9.10.x before 9.10.1-P2, when DNSSEC validation and the managed-keys feature are e
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 22.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 97.6% of all records.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: bind9 (Debian:12) 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9; bind9 (Debian:6.0) 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze14; bind9 (Debian:7) 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u4.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to bind9 (Debian:12) 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9; bind9 (Debian:6.0) 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze14; bind9 (Debian:7) 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u4 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
named in ISC BIND 9.7.0 through 9.9.6 before 9.9.6-P2 and 9.10.x before 9.10.1-P2, when DNSSEC validation and the managed-keys feature are enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit, or daemon crash) by triggering an incorrect trust-anchor management scenario in which no key is ready for use.
- Published
- Feb 18, 2015
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 22.2% · 98th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-399
Report tools
Action score
28
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 7 / 30 · 22.2%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| isc | bind | cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- isc bind9.10.0
- isc bind9.10.1
- isc bind9.10.2
- isc bind9.7.0
- isc bind9.7.1
- isc bind9.7.2
- isc bind9.7.3
- isc bind9.7.4
- isc bind9.7.5
- isc bind9.7.6
- isc bind9.7.7
- isc bind9.8.0
- isc bind9.8.1
- isc bind9.8.2
- isc bind9.8.3
- isc bind9.8.4
- isc bind9.8.5
- isc bind9.8.6
- isc bind9.9.0
- isc bind9.9.1
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | bind9 | before 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9 | 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9 |
| Debian:6.0 | bind9 | before 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze14 | 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze14 |
| Debian:7 | bind9 | before 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u4 | 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind | before 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 | 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-chroot | before 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 | 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-debuginfo | before 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 | 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-devel | before 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 | 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-libs | before 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 | 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-sdb | before 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 | 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | bind-utils | before 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 | 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind | before 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-chroot | before 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-debuginfo | before 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-devel | before 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-libs | before 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-libs-lite | before 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-license | before 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-lite-devel | before 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-sdb | before 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-sdb-chroot | before 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | bind-utils | before 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | bind | before 32:9.9.4-18.ael7b_1.1 | 32:9.9.4-18.ael7b_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | bind-chroot | before 32:9.9.4-18.ael7b_1.1 | 32:9.9.4-18.ael7b_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | bind-debuginfo | before 32:9.9.4-18.ael7b_1.1 | 32:9.9.4-18.ael7b_1.1 |
+9
Same product
isc: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2015-5477named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.7-P2 and 9.10.x before 9.10.2-P3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (REQUIRE assertion faKEV90Now
- CVE-2016-2776buffer.c in named in ISC BIND 9 before 9.9.9-P3, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P3, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0rc3 does not properly construct responses,57Plan
- CVE-2016-1286named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure an53Plan
- CVE-2020-8625A vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack51Plan
- CVE-2020-8617A logic error in code which checks TSIG validity can be used to trigger an assertion failure in tsig.c51Plan
- CVE-2001-0010Buffer overflow in transaction signature (TSIG) handling code in BIND 8 allows remote attackers to gain root privileges.49Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:bind9 | 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind | 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-chroot | 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-debuginfo | 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-devel | 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-libs | 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-libs-lite | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-license | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-lite-devel | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-sdb | 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-sdb-chroot | 32:9.9.4-18.el7_1.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bind-utils | 32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:bind | 9.9.6P1-18.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- C · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- High
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- C
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-399 · Resource Management ErrorsCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (17 more)Show less
- lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00004.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/150904.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/150905.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00013.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00050.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-07/msg00038.html
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143740940810833&w=2
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0672.html
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:054
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:165
- www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2503-1
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193820
- kb.isc.org/article/AA-01235
- kb.juniper.net/JSA10783
- kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10116
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/201510-01
- support.apple.com/HT205219
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.