automount 5.0.8, when a program map uses certain interpreted languages, uses the calling user's USER and HOME environment variable values in
automount 5.0.8, when a program map uses certain interpreted languages, uses the calling user's USER and HOME environment variable values instead of the values for the user used to run the mapped program, which allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse program in the user home directory.
- Published
- Mar 18, 2015
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 24th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-264
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
17
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redhat | enterprise linux desktop | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop |
| redhat | enterprise linux hpc node | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_hpc_node |
| redhat | enterprise linux server | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server |
| redhat | enterprise linux workstation | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation |
| automount project | automount | cpe:2.3:a:automount_project:automount |
| opensuse | opensuse | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:opensuse |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- automount project automount5.0.8
- opensuse opensuse13.1
- opensuse opensuse13.2
- redhat enterprise linux desktop6.0
- redhat enterprise linux hpc node6.0
- redhat enterprise linux server6.0
- redhat enterprise linux workstation6.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | autofs | before 5.0.8-2 | 5.0.8-2 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | autofs | before 5.1.1-3.5 | 5.1.1-3.5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | autofs | before 1:5.0.5-113.el6 | 1:5.0.5-113.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | autofs-debuginfo | before 1:5.0.5-113.el6 | 1:5.0.5-113.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | autofs | before 1:5.0.7-54.el7 | 1:5.0.7-54.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | autofs-debuginfo | before 1:5.0.7-54.el7 | 1:5.0.7-54.el7 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | autofs | before 5.0.9-8.1 | 5.0.9-8.1 |
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-5375JIT code allocation can allow for a bypass of ASLR and DEP protections leading to potential memory corruption attacks.49Plan
- CVE-2018-14649It was found that ceph-isci-cli package as shipped by Red Hat Ceph Storage 2 and 3 is using python-werkzeug in debug shell mode.43Plan
- CVE-2016-7050SerializableProvider in RESTEasy in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop 7, Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node 7, Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server41Plan
- CVE-2010-5325Heap-based buffer overflow in the unhtmlify function in foomatic-rip in foomatic-filters before 4.0.6 allows remote attackers to cause a den41Plan
- CVE-2018-5156A vulnerability can occur when capturing a media stream when the media source type is changed as the capture is occurring.40Plan
- CVE-2018-12378A use-after-free vulnerability can occur when an IndexedDB index is deleted while still in use by JavaScript code that is providing payload 40Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:autofs | 5.0.8-2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:autofs | 5.1.1-3.5 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:autofs | 1:5.0.5-113.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:autofs-debuginfo | 1:5.0.5-113.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:autofs | 5.0.9-8.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-264 · Permissions, Privileges, and Access ControlsCVSS vector
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2579-1
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-03/msg00033.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1344.html
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/73211
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192565
- bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917977
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.