IcedTea-Web before 1.5.3 and 1.6.x before 1.6.1 does not properly sanitize applet URLs, which allows remote attackers to inject applets into
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 81.7% of all records.
- Fixed version: icedtea-web (Debian:12) 1.6.1-1; icedtea-web (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.6.2-1.el6; icedtea-web-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.6.2-1.el6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to icedtea-web (Debian:12) 1.6.1-1; icedtea-web (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.6.2-1.el6; icedtea-web-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.6.2-1.el6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
IcedTea-Web before 1.5.3 and 1.6.x before 1.6.1 does not properly sanitize applet URLs, which allows remote attackers to inject applets into the .appletTrustSettings configuration file and bypass user approval to execute the applet via a crafted web page, possibly related to line breaks.
- Published
- Oct 9, 2015
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.1% · 81th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
28
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 27 / 40 · 6.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.1%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redhat | enterprise linux desktop | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop |
| redhat | enterprise linux hpc node | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_hpc_node |
| redhat | enterprise linux server | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server |
| redhat | enterprise linux workstation | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation |
| redhat | icedtea | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:icedtea |
| opensuse | opensuse | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:opensuse |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- fedoraproject fedora21
- fedoraproject fedora22
- opensuse opensuse13.1
- opensuse opensuse13.2
- redhat enterprise linux desktop6.0
- redhat enterprise linux hpc node6.0
- redhat enterprise linux server6.0
- redhat enterprise linux workstation6.0
- redhat icedteaup to 1.5.2 inclusive
- redhat icedtea1.6
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | icedtea-web | before 1.6.1-1 | 1.6.1-1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | icedtea-web | before 0:1.6.2-1.el6 | 0:1.6.2-1.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | icedtea-web-debuginfo | before 0:1.6.2-1.el6 | 0:1.6.2-1.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | icedtea-web-javadoc | before 0:1.6.2-1.el6 | 0:1.6.2-1.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | icedtea-web | before 0:1.6.1-4.el7 | 0:1.6.1-4.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | icedtea-web-debuginfo | before 0:1.6.1-4.el7 | 0:1.6.1-4.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | icedtea-web-javadoc | before 0:1.6.1-4.el7 | 0:1.6.1-4.el7 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 11 SP4 | icedtea-web | before 1.5.3-0.9.1 | 1.5.3-0.9.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | java-1_7_0-openjdk-plugin | before 1.6.1-2.3.1 | 1.6.1-2.3.1 |
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-5375JIT code allocation can allow for a bypass of ASLR and DEP protections leading to potential memory corruption attacks.49Plan
- CVE-2018-14649It was found that ceph-isci-cli package as shipped by Red Hat Ceph Storage 2 and 3 is using python-werkzeug in debug shell mode.43Plan
- CVE-2016-7050SerializableProvider in RESTEasy in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop 7, Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node 7, Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server41Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2012-6662Nov 24, 2014 · Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the default content option in jquery.ui.tooltip.js in the Tooltip widget in jQuery UI before 1.119Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2014-8169Mar 18, 2015 · automount 5.0.8, when a program map uses certain interpreted languages, uses the calling user's USER and HOME environment variable values in17Monitor
- Later →CVE-2015-8327Dec 17, 2015 · Incomplete blacklist vulnerability in util.c in foomatic-rip in cups-filters 1.0.42 before 1.2.0 and in foomatic-filters in Foomatic 4.0.x a33Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:icedtea-web | 1.6.1-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:icedtea-web | 0:1.6.1-4.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:icedtea-web-debuginfo | 0:1.6.1-4.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:icedtea-web-javadoc | 0:1.6.1-4.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:icedtea-web | 1.5.3-0.9.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 11 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:java-1_7_0-openjdk-plugin | 1.6.1-2.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (8 more)Show less
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-September/167130.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-09/msg00019.html
- mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2015-September/033546.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0778.html
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html
- www.securitytracker.com/id/1033780
- www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2817-1
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233667
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.