Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2012-5524· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

The _ssl_verify_callback function in tls_nb.py in Gajim before 0.15.3 does not properly verify SSL certificates, which allows remote attacke

The _ssl_verify_callback function in tls_nb.py in Gajim before 0.15.3 does not properly verify SSL certificates, which allows remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks and spoof servers via an arbitrary certificate from a trusted CA.

MediumCVSS 4.3 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Feb 7, 2014
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
1.1% · 66th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

17

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
17 / 40 · 4.3 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 1.1%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
gajimgajim

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • gajim gajimup to 0.15.2 inclusive
  • gajim gajim0.1
  • gajim gajim0.10
  • gajim gajim0.10.1
  • gajim gajim0.11
  • gajim gajim0.11.1
  • gajim gajim0.11.2
  • gajim gajim0.11.3
  • gajim gajim0.11.4
  • gajim gajim0.12
  • gajim gajim0.12.1
  • gajim gajim0.12.2
  • gajim gajim0.12.3
  • gajim gajim0.12.4
  • gajim gajim0.12.5
  • gajim gajim0.13
  • gajim gajim0.13.1
  • gajim gajim0.13.2
  • gajim gajim0.13.3
  • gajim gajim0.13.4

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12gajimbefore 0.15.4-10.15.4-1

Same product

gajim: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2012-2086SQL injection vulnerability in the get_last_conversation_lines function in common/logger.py in Gajim before 0.15 allows remote attackers to
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2021-41055Gajim 1.2.x and 1.3.x before 1.3.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted XMPP Last Message Correction (
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2012-2085The exec_command function in common/helpers.py in Gajim before 0.15 allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via
    28Monitor
  • CVE-2015-8688Gajim before 0.16.5 allows remote attackers to modify the roster and intercept messages via a crafted roster-push IQ stanza.
    22Monitor
  • CVE-2022-39835An issue was discovered in Gajim through 1.4.7.
    21Monitor
  • CVE-2016-10376Gajim through 0.16.7 unconditionally implements the "XEP-0146: Remote Controlling Clients" extension.
    18Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:gajim0.15.4-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

    If successful

    Confidentiality
    none
    Integrity
    P · data or configuration can be modified
    Availability
    none
    Attack complexity
    M
    Confidentiality impact
    None
    Integrity impact
    P
    Availability impact
    None

    Weakness class (CWE)

    CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation

    CVSS vector

    AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N

    nvd-primary

    Attack context

    MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

    Noroxi analysis

    No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

    We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

    We use this product, ask for help

    Change log

    1. Fix✗ → ✓

    For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

    References

    Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

    All records