The exec_command function in common/helpers.py in Gajim before 0.15 allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via
The exec_command function in common/helpers.py in Gajim before 0.15 allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in an href attribute.
- Published
- Aug 28, 2012
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.2% · 88th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-94
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
28
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 27 / 40 · 6.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.2%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gajim | gajim | cpe:2.3:a:gajim:gajim |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- gajim gajimup to 0.14.4 inclusive
- gajim gajim0.1
- gajim gajim0.10
- gajim gajim0.10.1
- gajim gajim0.11
- gajim gajim0.11.1
- gajim gajim0.11.2
- gajim gajim0.11.3
- gajim gajim0.11.4
- gajim gajim0.12
- gajim gajim0.12.1
- gajim gajim0.12.2
- gajim gajim0.12.3
- gajim gajim0.12.4
- gajim gajim0.12.5
- gajim gajim0.13
- gajim gajim0.13.1
- gajim gajim0.13.2
- gajim gajim0.13.3
- gajim gajim0.13.4
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | gajim | before 0.15-1 | 0.15-1 |
| Debian:6.0 | gajim | before 0.13.4-3+squeeze2 | 0.13.4-3+squeeze2 |
| Debian:6.0 | gajim | before 0.13.4-3+squeeze3 | 0.13.4-3+squeeze3 |
Same product
gajim: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2012-2086SQL injection vulnerability in the get_last_conversation_lines function in common/logger.py in Gajim before 0.15 allows remote attackers to 31Monitor
- CVE-2021-41055Gajim 1.2.x and 1.3.x before 1.3.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted XMPP Last Message Correction (30Monitor
- CVE-2015-8688Gajim before 0.16.5 allows remote attackers to modify the roster and intercept messages via a crafted roster-push IQ stanza.22Monitor
- CVE-2022-39835An issue was discovered in Gajim through 1.4.7.21Monitor
- CVE-2016-10376Gajim through 0.16.7 unconditionally implements the "XEP-0146: Remote Controlling Clients" extension.18Monitor
- CVE-2012-5524The _ssl_verify_callback function in tls_nb.py in Gajim before 0.15.3 does not properly verify SSL certificates, which allows remote attacke17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:gajim | 0.15-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-94 · Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- secunia.com/advisories/48708
- secunia.com/advisories/48794
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201208-04.xml
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/08/1
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/08/2
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/52943
- trac.gajim.org/ticket/7031
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.