CVE-2012-4566: The DTLS support in radsecproxy before 1.6.2 does not properly verify certificates when there are configuration blocks with CA settings that…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 25/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 74.6% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: radsecproxy (Debian:12) 1.6.2-1; radsecproxy (Debian:6.0) 1.4-1+squeeze1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to radsecproxy (Debian:12) 1.6.2-1; radsecproxy (Debian:6.0) 1.4-1+squeeze1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The DTLS support in radsecproxy before 1.6.2 does not properly verify certificates when there are configuration blocks with CA settings that are unrelated to the block being used for verifying the certificate chain, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and spoof clients, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4523.
- Published
- Nov 19, 2012
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.4% · 74th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-264
Report tools
Action score
25
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 25 / 40 · 6.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.4%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| uninett | radsecproxy | cpe:2.3:a:uninett:radsecproxy |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- uninett radsecproxyup to 1.6.1 inclusive
- uninett radsecproxy1.0
- uninett radsecproxy1.1
- uninett radsecproxy1.2
- uninett radsecproxy1.3
- uninett radsecproxy1.3.1
- uninett radsecproxy1.4
- uninett radsecproxy1.4.1
+4 more rows
- uninett radsecproxy1.4.2
- uninett radsecproxy1.4.3
- uninett radsecproxy1.5
- uninett radsecproxy1.6
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | radsecproxy | before 1.6.2-1 | 1.6.2-1 |
| Debian:6.0 | radsecproxy | before 1.4-1+squeeze1 | 1.4-1+squeeze1 |
Same product
uninett: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-32642Missing input validation in dynamic discovery example scripts.37Monitor
- CVE-2012-4523radsecproxy before 1.6.1 does not properly verify certificates when there are configuration blocks with CA settings that are unrelated to…26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:radsecproxy | 1.6.2-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-264 · Permissions, Privileges, and Access ControlsCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (6 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.