CVE-2012-1178: The msn_oim_report_to_user function in oim.c in the MSN protocol plugin in libpurple in Pidgin before 2.10.2 allows remote servers to cause…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.3% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 84.1% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: pidgin (Debian:12) 2.10.2-1; finch (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client) 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4; libpurple (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client) 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to pidgin (Debian:12) 2.10.2-1; finch (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client) 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4; libpurple (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client) 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The msn_oim_report_to_user function in oim.c in the MSN protocol plugin in libpurple in Pidgin before 2.10.2 allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via an OIM message that lacks UTF-8 encoding.
- Published
- Mar 15, 2012
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.3% · 84th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-399
Report tools
Action score
21
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.3%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| pidgin | pidgin | cpe:2.3:a:pidgin:pidgin |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- pidgin pidginup to 2.10.1 inclusive
- pidgin pidgin2.0.0
- pidgin pidgin2.0.1
- pidgin pidgin2.0.2
- pidgin pidgin2.1.0
- pidgin pidgin2.1.1
- pidgin pidgin2.10.0
- pidgin pidgin2.2.0
+12 more rows
- pidgin pidgin2.2.1
- pidgin pidgin2.2.2
- pidgin pidgin2.3.0
- pidgin pidgin2.3.1
- pidgin pidgin2.4.0
- pidgin pidgin2.4.1
- pidgin pidgin2.4.2
- pidgin pidgin2.4.3
- pidgin pidgin2.5.0
- pidgin pidgin2.5.1
- pidgin pidgin2.5.2
- pidgin pidgin2.5.3
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | pidgin | before 2.10.2-1 | 2.10.2-1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | finch | before 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | libpurple | before 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | libpurple-perl | before 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | libpurple-tcl | before 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | pidgin | before 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | pidgin-debuginfo | before 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | pidgin-perl | before 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | finch-devel | before 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | libpurple-devel | before 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | pidgin-devel | before 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | finch | before 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 | 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | finch-devel | before 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 | 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libpurple | before 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 | 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libpurple-devel | before 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 | 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libpurple-perl | before 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 | 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libpurple-tcl | before 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 | 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | pidgin | before 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 | 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | pidgin-debuginfo | before 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 | 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | pidgin-devel | before 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 | 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | pidgin-docs | before 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 | 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | pidgin-perl | before 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 | 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 |
Same product
pidgin: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2009-2694The msn_slplink_process_msg function in libpurple/protocols/msn/slplink.c in libpurple, as used in Pidgin (formerly Gaim) before 2.5.9 and…46Plan
- CVE-2013-6490The SIMPLE protocol functionality in Pidgin before 2.10.8 allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via a negative…44Plan
- CVE-2017-2640An out-of-bounds write flaw was found in the way Pidgin before 2.12.0 processed XML content.41Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2011-4601Dec 24, 2011 · family_feedbag.c in the oscar protocol plugin in libpurple in Pidgin before 2.10.1 does not perform the expected UTF-8 validation on…21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2011-4939Mar 15, 2012 · The pidgin_conv_chat_rename_user function in gtkconv.c in Pidgin before 2.10.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL…26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2012-2369May 23, 2012 · Format string vulnerability in the log_message_cb function in otr-plugin.c in the Off-the-Record Messaging (OTR) pidgin-otr plugin before 3.31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:pidgin | 2.10.2-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:finch | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:finch-devel | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libpurple | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libpurple-devel | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libpurple-perl | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libpurple-tcl | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pidgin | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pidgin-debuginfo | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pidgin-devel | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pidgin-docs | 0:2.7.9-5.el6.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pidgin-perl | 0:2.6.6-11.el5.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-399 · Resource Management ErrorsCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (8 more)Show less
- developer.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/diff/60f8379d0a610538cf42e0dd9ab1436c8b9308cd/with/3053d6a37cc6d8774aba7607b992a4408216adcd/libpurple/protocols/msn/oim.c
- developer.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/info/3053d6a37cc6d8774aba7607b992a4408216adcd
- pidgin.im/news/security/?id=61
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1102.html
- secunia.com/advisories/50005
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:029
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/52475
- oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A18019
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.