Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2011-4601· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

family_feedbag.c in the oscar protocol plugin in libpurple in Pidgin before 2.10.1 does not perform the expected UTF-8 validation on message

family_feedbag.c in the oscar protocol plugin in libpurple in Pidgin before 2.10.1 does not perform the expected UTF-8 validation on message data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted (1) AIM or (2) ICQ message associated with buddy-list addition.

MediumCVSS 5.0 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Dec 24, 2011
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
4.5% · 91th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

21

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
20 / 40 · 5.0 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 4.5%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
pidginpidgin

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • pidgin pidginup to 2.10.0 inclusive
  • pidgin pidgin2.0.0
  • pidgin pidgin2.0.1
  • pidgin pidgin2.0.2
  • pidgin pidgin2.1.0
  • pidgin pidgin2.1.1
  • pidgin pidgin2.2.0
  • pidgin pidgin2.2.1
  • pidgin pidgin2.2.2
  • pidgin pidgin2.3.0
  • pidgin pidgin2.3.1
  • pidgin pidgin2.4.0
  • pidgin pidgin2.4.1
  • pidgin pidgin2.4.2
  • pidgin pidgin2.4.3
  • pidgin pidgin2.5.0
  • pidgin pidgin2.5.1
  • pidgin pidgin2.5.2
  • pidgin pidgin2.5.3
  • pidgin pidgin2.5.4

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12pidginbefore 2.10.1-12.10.1-1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asfinchbefore 0:2.6.6-10.el40:2.6.6-10.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asfinch-develbefore 0:2.6.6-10.el40:2.6.6-10.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::aslibpurplebefore 0:2.6.6-10.el40:2.6.6-10.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::aslibpurple-develbefore 0:2.6.6-10.el40:2.6.6-10.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::aslibpurple-perlbefore 0:2.6.6-10.el40:2.6.6-10.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::aslibpurple-tclbefore 0:2.6.6-10.el40:2.6.6-10.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::aspidginbefore 0:2.6.6-10.el40:2.6.6-10.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::aspidgin-debuginfobefore 0:2.6.6-10.el40:2.6.6-10.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::aspidgin-develbefore 0:2.6.6-10.el40:2.6.6-10.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::aspidgin-perlbefore 0:2.6.6-10.el40:2.6.6-10.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientfinchbefore 0:2.6.6-5.el5_7.40:2.6.6-5.el5_7.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientlibpurplebefore 0:2.6.6-5.el5_7.40:2.6.6-5.el5_7.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientlibpurple-perlbefore 0:2.6.6-5.el5_7.40:2.6.6-5.el5_7.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientlibpurple-tclbefore 0:2.6.6-5.el5_7.40:2.6.6-5.el5_7.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientpidginbefore 0:2.6.6-5.el5_7.40:2.6.6-5.el5_7.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientpidgin-debuginfobefore 0:2.6.6-5.el5_7.40:2.6.6-5.el5_7.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientpidgin-perlbefore 0:2.6.6-5.el5_7.40:2.6.6-5.el5_7.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationfinch-develbefore 0:2.6.6-5.el5_7.40:2.6.6-5.el5_7.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationlibpurple-develbefore 0:2.6.6-5.el5_7.40:2.6.6-5.el5_7.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationpidgin-develbefore 0:2.6.6-5.el5_7.40:2.6.6-5.el5_7.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientfinchbefore 0:2.7.9-3.el6.20:2.7.9-3.el6.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientfinch-develbefore 0:2.7.9-3.el6.20:2.7.9-3.el6.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientlibpurplebefore 0:2.7.9-3.el6.20:2.7.9-3.el6.2

+8

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2009-2694The msn_slplink_process_msg function in libpurple/protocols/msn/slplink.c in libpurple, as used in Pidgin (formerly Gaim) before 2.5.9 and A
    46Plan
  • CVE-2013-6490The SIMPLE protocol functionality in Pidgin before 2.10.8 allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via a negative Content-Lengt
    44Plan
  • CVE-2017-2640An out-of-bounds write flaw was found in the way Pidgin before 2.12.0 processed XML content.
    41Plan
  • CVE-2009-1376Multiple integer overflows in the msn_slplink_process_msg functions in the MSN protocol handler in (1) libpurple/protocols/msn/slplink.c and
    41Plan
  • CVE-2016-1000030Pidgin version <2.11.0 contains a vulnerability in X.509 Certificates imports specifically due to improper check of return values from gnutl
    40Plan
  • CVE-2013-6486gtkutils.c in Pidgin before 2.10.8 on Windows allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary programs via a message containing a
    38Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:pidgin2.10.1-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
red hat:finch0:2.6.6-10.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:finch-devel0:2.6.6-10.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:libpurple0:2.6.6-10.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:libpurple-devel0:2.6.6-10.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:libpurple-perl0:2.6.6-10.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:libpurple-tcl0:2.6.6-10.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:pidgin0:2.6.6-10.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:pidgin-debuginfo0:2.6.6-10.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:pidgin-devel0:2.6.6-10.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:pidgin-docs0:2.7.9-3.el6.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:pidgin-perl0:2.6.6-10.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records