CVE-2011-4609: The svc_run function in the RPC implementation in glibc before 2.15 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption)…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.8% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 79.2% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: glibc (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:2.3.4-2.57; glibc-common (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:2.3.4-2.57; glibc-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:2.3.4-2.57.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to glibc (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:2.3.4-2.57; glibc-common (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:2.3.4-2.57; glibc-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:2.3.4-2.57 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The svc_run function in the RPC implementation in glibc before 2.15 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a large number of RPC connections.
- Published
- May 2, 2013
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.8% · 79th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-399
Report tools
Action score
21
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 1.8%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gnu | glibc | cpe:2.3:a:gnu:glibc |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- gnu glibcup to 2.14 inclusive
- gnu glibc2.0
- gnu glibc2.0.1
- gnu glibc2.0.2
- gnu glibc2.0.3
- gnu glibc2.0.4
- gnu glibc2.0.5
- gnu glibc2.0.6
+7 more rows
- gnu glibc2.1
- gnu glibc2.1.1
- gnu glibc2.1.1.6
- gnu glibc2.1.2
- gnu glibc2.1.3
- gnu glibc2.1.9
- gnu glibc2.13
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc-common | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc-debuginfo | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc-debuginfo-common | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc-devel | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc-headers | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc-profile | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc-utils | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | nptl-devel | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | nscd | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | glibc | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | glibc-common | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | glibc-debuginfo | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | glibc-debuginfo-common | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | glibc-devel | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | glibc-headers | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | glibc-utils | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | nscd | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | glibc | before 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | glibc-common | before 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | glibc-debuginfo | before 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | glibc-debuginfo-common | before 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | glibc-devel | before 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | glibc-headers | before 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 |
+3
Same product
gnu: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2023-4911Glibc: buffer overflow in ld.so leading to privilege escalationKEV80Now
- CVE-2015-0235Heap-based buffer overflow in the __nss_hostname_digits_dots function in glibc 2.2, and other 2.x versions before 2.18, allows…68This week
- CVE-2015-7547Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the (1) send_dg and (2) send_vc functions in the libresolv library in the GNU C Library (aka glibc…60This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2013-1914Apr 29, 2013 · Stack-based buffer overflow in the getaddrinfo function in sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c in GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.17 and…21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2009-5029May 2, 2013 · Integer overflow in the __tzfile_read function in glibc before 2.15 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash)…30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2012-0864May 2, 2013 · Integer overflow in the vfprintf function in stdio-common/vfprintf.c in glibc 2.14 and other versions allows context-dependent attackers to…28Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| red hat:glibc | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-common | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-debuginfo | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-debuginfo-common | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-devel | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-headers | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-profile | 0:2.3.4-2.57 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-static | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-utils | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:nptl-devel | 0:2.3.4-2.57 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:nscd | 0:2.12-1.47.el6_2.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-399 · Resource Management ErrorsCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.