GNOME Evolution before 3.2.3 allows user-assisted remote attackers to read arbitrary files via the attachment parameter to a mailto: URL, wh
GNOME Evolution before 3.2.3 allows user-assisted remote attackers to read arbitrary files via the attachment parameter to a mailto: URL, which attaches the file to the email.
- Published
- Mar 8, 2013
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.7% · 85th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-200
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
18
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.7%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gnome | evolution | cpe:2.3:a:gnome:evolution |
| oracle | solaris | cpe:2.3:o:oracle:solaris |
| redhat | enterprise linux desktop | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop |
| redhat | enterprise linux server | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server |
| redhat | enterprise linux workstation | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- gnome evolutionup to 3.0.3 inclusive
- gnome evolution1.0.8
- gnome evolution1.11
- gnome evolution1.2
- gnome evolution1.2.1
- gnome evolution1.2.2
- gnome evolution1.2.3
- gnome evolution1.2.4
- gnome evolution1.4
- gnome evolution1.4.3
- gnome evolution1.4.4
- gnome evolution1.4.5
- gnome evolution1.4.6
- gnome evolution1.5
- gnome evolution2.0
- gnome evolution2.0.0
- gnome evolution2.0.1
- gnome evolution2.0.2
- gnome evolution2.1
- gnome evolution2.10.3
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | evolution | all versions | — |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | evolution | before 0:2.28.3-30.el6 | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | evolution-conduits | before 0:2.28.3-30.el6 | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | evolution-debuginfo | before 0:2.28.3-30.el6 | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | evolution-devel | before 0:2.28.3-30.el6 | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | evolution-help | before 0:2.28.3-30.el6 | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | evolution-perl | before 0:2.28.3-30.el6 | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | evolution-pst | before 0:2.28.3-30.el6 | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | evolution-spamassassin | before 0:2.28.3-30.el6 | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 |
Same product
gnome: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2016-10727camel/providers/imapx/camel-imapx-server.c in the IMAPx component in GNOME evolution-data-server before 3.21.2 proceeds with cleartext data 40Plan
- CVE-2018-12422addressbook/backends/ldap/e-book-backend-ldap.c in Evolution-Data-Server in GNOME Evolution through 3.29.2 might allow attackers to trigger 40Plan
- CVE-2005-0102Integer overflow in camel-lock-helper in Evolution 2.0.2 and earlier allows local users or remote malicious POP3 servers to execute arbitrar40Plan
- CVE-2008-1109Heap-based buffer overflow in Evolution 2.22.1 allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long DESCRIPTION proper39Monitor
- CVE-2008-1108Buffer overflow in Evolution 2.22.1, when the ITip Formatter plugin is disabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a lon32Monitor
- CVE-2009-3721Multiple directory traversal and buffer overflow vulnerabilities were discovered in yTNEF, and in Evolution's TNEF parser that is derived fr31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| red hat:evolution | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:evolution-conduits | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:evolution-debuginfo | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:evolution-devel | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:evolution-help | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:evolution-perl | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:evolution-pst | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:evolution-spamassassin | 0:2.28.3-30.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-200 · Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized ActorCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
The extension requests broader permissions than its function needs and sends the data it collects out for purposes beyond its stated function.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-200 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
{ "permissions": ["tabs", "<all_urls>"], "background": { "service_worker": "analytics.js" }}Fixed
{ "permissions": ["activeTab"], "host_permissions": ["https://yildiz.example/*"]}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- ExcavationCAPEC-116likelihood: High · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
- FootprintingCAPEC-169likelihood: High · Very Low
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- FingerprintingCAPEC-224likelihood: High · Very Low
- ICMP Echo Request PingCAPEC-285likelihood: Medium · Low
- TCP SYN ScanCAPEC-287Low
- Enumerate Mail Exchange (MX) RecordsCAPEC-290Low
ATT&CK techniques
- System Service DiscoveryT1007
- System Network Configuration DiscoveryT1016
- Remote System DiscoveryT1018
- System Owner/User DiscoveryT1033
- Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or LocationT1036.005
- Network Service ScanningT1046
- System Network Connections DiscoveryT1049
- Process DiscoveryT1057
- Permission Groups DiscoveryT1069
- System Information DiscoveryT1082
- File and Directory DiscoveryT1083
- Account DiscoveryT1087
- Multi-Factor Authentication InterceptionT1111
- Peripheral Device DiscoveryT1120
- System Time DiscoveryT1124
- Access Token Manipulation:Token Impersonation/TheftT1134.001
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0516.html
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjan2015-2370101.html
- bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657374
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733504
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/82450
- git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?id=0a478083fa31aec0059bc6feacc054226fe55b56
- git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?id=588c410718068388f8ce0004a71c104a4c89cce3
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.