The DHCP client (udhcpc) in BusyBox before 1.20.0 allows remote DHCP servers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the (
The DHCP client (udhcpc) in BusyBox before 1.20.0 allows remote DHCP servers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the (1) HOST_NAME, (2) DOMAIN_NAME, (3) NIS_DOMAIN, and (4) TFTP_SERVER_NAME host name options.
- Published
- Jul 3, 2012
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.8% · 78th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
28
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 27 / 40 · 6.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 1.8%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| busybox | busybox | cpe:2.3:a:busybox:busybox |
| t-mobile | tm-ac1900 | cpe:2.3:o:t-mobile:tm-ac1900 |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- busybox busyboxup to 1.19.4 inclusive
- busybox busybox0.60.5
- busybox busybox1.0.0
- busybox busybox1.00
- busybox busybox1.01
- busybox busybox1.1.0
- busybox busybox1.1.1
- busybox busybox1.1.2
- busybox busybox1.1.3
- busybox busybox1.10.0
- busybox busybox1.10.1
- busybox busybox1.10.2
- busybox busybox1.10.3
- busybox busybox1.10.4
- busybox busybox1.11.0
- busybox busybox1.11.1
- busybox busybox1.11.2
- busybox busybox1.11.3
- busybox busybox1.12.0
- busybox busybox1.12.1
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | busybox | before 1:1.20.0-3 | 1:1.20.0-3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | busybox | before 1:1.2.0-13.el5 | 1:1.2.0-13.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | busybox-anaconda | before 1:1.2.0-13.el5 | 1:1.2.0-13.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | busybox | before 1:1.15.1-15.el6 | 1:1.15.1-15.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | busybox-petitboot | before 1:1.15.1-15.el6 | 1:1.15.1-15.el6 |
Same product
busybox: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-1000517BusyBox project BusyBox wget version prior to commit 8e2174e9bd836e53c8b9c6e00d1bc6e2a718686e contains a Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Bu49Plan
- CVE-2016-2148Heap-based buffer overflow in the DHCP client (udhcpc) in BusyBox before 1.25.0 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via vecto47Plan
- CVE-2022-48174There is a stack overflow vulnerability in ash.c:6030 in busybox before 1.35.40Plan
- CVE-2021-42377An attacker-controlled pointer free in Busybox's hush applet leads to denial of service and possible code execution when processing a crafte40Plan
- CVE-2017-16544In the add_match function in libbb/lineedit.c in BusyBox through 1.27.2, the tab autocomplete feature of the shell, used to get a list of fi37Monitor
- CVE-2022-28391BusyBox through 1.35.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code if netstat is used to print a DNS PTR record's value to a VT compat36Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:busybox | 1:1.20.0-3 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:busybox | 1:1.2.0-13.el5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:busybox-anaconda | 1:1.2.0-13.el5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:busybox-petitboot | 1:1.15.1-15.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- C · data can be read
- Integrity
- C · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- C · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- High
- Confidentiality impact
- C
- Integrity impact
- C
- Availability impact
- C
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
AV:A/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- downloads.avaya.com/css/P8/documents/100158840
- packetstormsecurity.com/files/153278/WAGO-852-Industrial-Managed-Switch-Series-Code-Execution-Hardcoded-Credentials.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0810.html
- seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Jun/18
- seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Aug/20
- secunia.com/advisories/45363
- www.busybox.net/news.html
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:129
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/48879
- bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3979
- seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Jun/14
- support.t-mobile.com/docs/DOC-21994
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.