Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2006-1058· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

BusyBox 1.1.1 does not use a salt when generating passwords, which makes it easier for local users to guess passwords from a stolen password

BusyBox 1.1.1 does not use a salt when generating passwords, which makes it easier for local users to guess passwords from a stolen password file using techniques such as rainbow tables.

MediumCVSS 5.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Apr 4, 2006
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
0.3% · 20th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

22

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.3%

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

VendorProduct
busyboxbusybox
avayaaura application enablement services
avayaaura sip enablement services
avayamessage networking
avayamessaging storage server

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • avaya aura application enablement services4.01
  • avaya aura application enablement services4.1
  • avaya aura sip enablement servicesbefore 5.0
  • avaya message networkingall versions
  • avaya messaging storage server3.0 and later · before 4.0
  • busybox busybox1.1.1

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12busyboxbefore 1:1.1.3-11:1.1.3-1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asbusyboxbefore 0:1.00.rc1-7.el40:1.00.rc1-7.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asbusybox-anacondabefore 0:1.00.rc1-7.el40:1.00.rc1-7.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asbusybox-debuginfobefore 0:1.00.rc1-7.el40:1.00.rc1-7.el4

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2018-1000517BusyBox project BusyBox wget version prior to commit 8e2174e9bd836e53c8b9c6e00d1bc6e2a718686e contains a Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Bu
    49Plan
  • CVE-2016-2148Heap-based buffer overflow in the DHCP client (udhcpc) in BusyBox before 1.25.0 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via vecto
    47Plan
  • CVE-2022-48174There is a stack overflow vulnerability in ash.c:6030 in busybox before 1.35.
    40Plan
  • CVE-2021-42377An attacker-controlled pointer free in Busybox's hush applet leads to denial of service and possible code execution when processing a crafte
    40Plan
  • CVE-2017-16544In the add_match function in libbb/lineedit.c in BusyBox through 1.27.2, the tab autocomplete feature of the shell, used to get a list of fi
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2022-28391BusyBox through 1.35.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code if netstat is used to print a DNS PTR record's value to a VT compat
    36Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:busybox1:1.1.3-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
red hat:busybox0:1.00.rc1-7.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:busybox-anaconda0:1.00.rc1-7.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:busybox-debuginfo0:1.00.rc1-7.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
none
Availability
none
Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
None

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records