CVE-2006-1058: BusyBox 1.1.1 does not use a salt when generating passwords, which makes it easier for local users to guess passwords from a stolen password
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.29% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: busybox (Debian:12) 1:1.1.3-1; busybox (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:1.00.rc1-7.el4; busybox-anaconda (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:1.00.rc1-7.el4.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to busybox (Debian:12) 1:1.1.3-1; busybox (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:1.00.rc1-7.el4; busybox-anaconda (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:1.00.rc1-7.el4 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
BusyBox 1.1.1 does not use a salt when generating passwords, which makes it easier for local users to guess passwords from a stolen password file using techniques such as rainbow tables.
- Published
- Apr 4, 2006
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 21th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-916
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| busybox | busybox | cpe:2.3:a:busybox:busybox |
| avaya | aura application enablement services | cpe:2.3:a:avaya:aura_application_enablement_services |
| avaya | aura sip enablement services | cpe:2.3:a:avaya:aura_sip_enablement_services |
| avaya | message networking | cpe:2.3:a:avaya:message_networking |
| avaya | messaging storage server | cpe:2.3:a:avaya:messaging_storage_server |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- avaya aura application enablement services4.01
- avaya aura application enablement services4.1
- avaya aura sip enablement servicesbefore 5.0
- avaya message networkingall versions
- avaya messaging storage server3.0 and later · before 4.0
- busybox busybox1.1.1
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | busybox | before 1:1.1.3-1 | 1:1.1.3-1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | busybox | before 0:1.00.rc1-7.el4 | 0:1.00.rc1-7.el4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | busybox-anaconda | before 0:1.00.rc1-7.el4 | 0:1.00.rc1-7.el4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | busybox-debuginfo | before 0:1.00.rc1-7.el4 | 0:1.00.rc1-7.el4 |
Same product
busybox: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-1000517BusyBox project BusyBox wget version prior to commit 8e2174e9bd836e53c8b9c6e00d1bc6e2a718686e contains a Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Bu49Plan
- CVE-2016-2148Heap-based buffer overflow in the DHCP client (udhcpc) in BusyBox before 1.25.0 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via vecto47Plan
- CVE-2022-48174There is a stack overflow vulnerability in ash.c:6030 in busybox before 1.35.40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- Later →CVE-2011-2716Jul 3, 2012 · The DHCP client (udhcpc) in BusyBox before 1.20.0 allows remote DHCP servers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the (28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2013-1813Nov 23, 2013 · util-linux/mdev.c in BusyBox before 1.21.0 uses 0777 permissions for parent directories when creating nested directories under /dev/, which 28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2016-6301Dec 9, 2016 · The recv_and_process_client_pkt function in networking/ntpd.c in busybox allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and bandw33Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:busybox | 1:1.1.3-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:busybox | 0:1.00.rc1-7.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:busybox-anaconda | 0:1.00.rc1-7.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:busybox-debuginfo | 0:1.00.rc1-7.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-916 · Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational EffortCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (8 more)Show less
- secunia.com/advisories/19477
- secunia.com/advisories/25098
- secunia.com/advisories/25848
- support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2007-250.htm
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2007-0244.html
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/17330
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25569
- oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9483
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.