The addmntent function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.13 and earlier does not report an error status for failed attempts to wri
The addmntent function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.13 and earlier does not report an error status for failed attempts to write to the /etc/mtab file, which makes it easier for local users to trigger corruption of this file, as demonstrated by writes from a process with a small RLIMIT_FSIZE value, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0296.
- Published
- Apr 9, 2011
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 34th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-16
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
13
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 13 / 40 · 3.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gnu | glibc | cpe:2.3:a:gnu:glibc |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- gnu glibcup to 2.13 inclusive
- gnu glibc1.00
- gnu glibc1.01
- gnu glibc1.02
- gnu glibc1.03
- gnu glibc1.04
- gnu glibc1.05
- gnu glibc1.06
- gnu glibc1.07
- gnu glibc1.08
- gnu glibc1.09
- gnu glibc1.09.1
- gnu glibc2.0
- gnu glibc2.0.1
- gnu glibc2.0.2
- gnu glibc2.0.3
- gnu glibc2.0.4
- gnu glibc2.0.5
- gnu glibc2.0.6
- gnu glibc2.1
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | glibc | before 2.13-8 | 2.13-8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc-common | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc-debuginfo | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc-debuginfo-common | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc-devel | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc-headers | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc-profile | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | glibc-utils | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | nptl-devel | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | nscd | before 0:2.3.4-2.57 | 0:2.3.4-2.57 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | glibc | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | glibc-common | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | glibc-debuginfo | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | glibc-debuginfo-common | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | glibc-devel | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | glibc-headers | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | glibc-utils | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | nscd | before 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 | 0:2.5-65.el5_7.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | glibc | before 0:2.12-1.47.el6 | 0:2.12-1.47.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | glibc-common | before 0:2.12-1.47.el6 | 0:2.12-1.47.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | glibc-debuginfo | before 0:2.12-1.47.el6 | 0:2.12-1.47.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | glibc-debuginfo-common | before 0:2.12-1.47.el6 | 0:2.12-1.47.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | glibc-devel | before 0:2.12-1.47.el6 | 0:2.12-1.47.el6 |
+4
Same product
gnu: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2023-4911Glibc: buffer overflow in ld.so leading to privilege escalationKEV85Now
- CVE-2015-0235Heap-based buffer overflow in the __nss_hostname_digits_dots function in glibc 2.2, and other 2.x versions before 2.18, allows context-depen68This week
- CVE-2015-7547Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the (1) send_dg and (2) send_vc functions in the libresolv library in the GNU C Library (aka glibc 59Plan
- CVE-2024-2961The iconv() function in the GNU C Library versions 2.39 and older may overflow the output buffer passed to it by up to 4 bytes when converti55Plan
- CVE-2018-11236stdlib/canonicalize.c in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.27 and earlier, when processing very long pathname arguments to the realpa41Plan
- CVE-2015-8779Stack-based buffer overflow in the catopen function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allows context-dependent attackers41Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:glibc | 2.13-8 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc | 0:2.12-1.47.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-common | 0:2.12-1.47.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-debuginfo | 0:2.12-1.47.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-debuginfo-common | 0:2.12-1.47.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-devel | 0:2.12-1.47.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-headers | 0:2.12-1.47.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-profile | 0:2.3.4-2.57 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-static | 0:2.12-1.47.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-utils | 0:2.12-1.47.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:nptl-devel | 0:2.3.4-2.57 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:nscd | 0:2.12-1.47.el6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-16 · ConfigurationCVSS vector
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/10
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/11
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/12
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/9
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/05/3
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/05/7
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/07/9
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/16
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/5
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/7
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/15/6
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/22/4
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/22/6
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/3
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/4
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/04/01/2
- sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12625
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:178
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:179
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-1526.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.