Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2010-3114· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

The text-editing implementation in Google Chrome before 5.0.375.127, and webkitgtk before 1.2.6, does not check a node type before performin

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Plan (action score 41/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.7% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 78% of all records.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: webkitgtk (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.2.6-2.el6_0; webkitgtk-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.2.6-2.el6_0; webkitgtk-devel (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.2.6-2.el6_0.

Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to webkitgtk (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.2.6-2.el6_0; webkitgtk-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.2.6-2.el6_0; webkitgtk-devel (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.2.6-2.el6_0 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

The text-editing implementation in Google Chrome before 5.0.375.127, and webkitgtk before 1.2.6, does not check a node type before performing a cast, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors related to (1) DeleteSelectionCommand.cpp, (2) InsertLineBreakCommand.cpp, or (3) InsertParagraphSeparatorCommand.cpp in WebCore/editing/.

CriticalCVSS 10.0 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Aug 24, 2010
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
1.7% · 78th percentile
CWE
—

Report tools

JSON

Action score

41

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS
40 / 40 · 10.0 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 1.7%

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2010-3114

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for google records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
googlechrome
webkitgtkwebkitgtk
canonicalubuntu linux

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • canonical ubuntu linux10.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux10.10
  • canonical ubuntu linux9.10
  • google chromebefore 5.0.375.127
  • webkitgtk webkitgtkbefore 1.2.6

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientwebkitgtkbefore 0:1.2.6-2.el6_00:1.2.6-2.el6_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientwebkitgtk-debuginfobefore 0:1.2.6-2.el6_00:1.2.6-2.el6_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientwebkitgtk-develbefore 0:1.2.6-2.el6_00:1.2.6-2.el6_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientwebkitgtk-docbefore 0:1.2.6-2.el6_00:1.2.6-2.el6_0

Same product

google: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2023-4863Heap buffer overflow in libwebp in Google Chrome prior to 116.0.5845.187 and libwebp 1.3.2 allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of boKEV
    95Now
  • CVE-2021-21224Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 90.0.4430.85 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a craftKEV
    90Now
  • CVE-2018-17463Incorrect side effect annotation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 70.0.3538.64 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sKEV
    90Now

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2010-3112Aug 24, 2010 · Google Chrome before 5.0.375.127 does not properly implement file dialogs, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corru
    40Plan
  • ← EarlierCVE-2010-3113Aug 24, 2010 · Google Chrome before 5.0.375.127, and webkitgtk before 1.2.5, does not properly handle SVG documents, which allows remote attackers to cause
    41Plan
  • Later →CVE-2010-3115Aug 24, 2010 · Google Chrome before 5.0.375.127, and webkitgtk before 1.2.6, does not properly implement the history feature, which might allow remote atta
    21Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
red hat:webkitgtk0:1.2.6-2.el6_0 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:webkitgtk-debuginfo0:1.2.6-2.el6_0 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:webkitgtk-devel0:1.2.6-2.el6_0 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:webkitgtk-doc0:1.2.6-2.el6_0 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
C · data can be read
Integrity
C · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
C · the service can be disrupted
Attack complexity
Low
Confidentiality impact
C
Integrity impact
C
Availability impact
C

Weakness class (CWE)

—

CVSS vector

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (13 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records