CVE-2009-3555: The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: This week (action score 65/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB, GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 87.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99.7% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: apache2 (Debian:12) 2.2.14-2; lighttpd (Debian:12) 1.4.30-1; nginx (Debian:12) 0.7.64-1.
- Mentioned 3 times in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Don’t wait for the next maintenance window. Upgrade to apache2 (Debian:12) 2.2.14-2; lighttpd (Debian:12) 1.4.30-1; nginx (Debian:12) 0.7.64-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert data into HTTPS sessions, and possibly other types of sessions protected by TLS or SSL, by sending an unauthenticated request that is processed retroactively by a server in a post-renegotiation context, related to a "plaintext injection" attack, aka the "Project Mogul" issue.
- Published
- Nov 9, 2009
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 87.2% · 99th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-295
Report tools
Action score
65
Don’t wait for the next maintenance window.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 26 / 30 · 87.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is Apache HTTP Server on your server exposed to the internet?Run a port scan
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| apache | http server | cpe:2.3:a:apache:http_server |
| gnu | gnutls | cpe:2.3:a:gnu:gnutls |
| mozilla | nss | cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:nss |
| openssl | openssl | cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
| f5 | nginx | cpe:2.3:a:f5:nginx |
Using http server? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (Apache HTTP)
Is Apache HTTP Server on your server exposed to the internet?
The free port scanner finds the open ports on your server and matches the service versions it can read against known vulnerabilities. No account needed.
Run a port scanAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- apache http serverup to 2.2.14 inclusive
- f5 nginx0.1.0 and later · up to 0.8.22 inclusive
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | apache2 | before 2.2.14-2 | 2.2.14-2 |
| Debian:12 | lighttpd | before 1.4.30-1 | 1.4.30-1 |
| Debian:12 | nginx | before 0.7.64-1 | 0.7.64-1 |
| Debian:12 | nss | before 3.12.6-1 | 3.12.6-1 |
| Debian:12 | openssl | before 0.9.8k-6 | 0.9.8k-6 |
| Debian:12 | tomcat-native | before 1.1.18-1 | 1.1.18-1 |
| Debian:13 | pound | before 2.6-6.1 | 2.6-6.1 |
| Debian:4.0 | apache2 | before 2.2.3-4+etch11 | 2.2.3-4+etch11 |
| Debian:5.0 | apache2 | before 2.2.9-10+lenny6 | 2.2.9-10+lenny6 |
| Debian:5.0 | nss | before 3.12.3.1-0lenny3 | 3.12.3.1-0lenny3 |
| Debian:5.0 | openssl | before 0.9.8g-15+lenny11 | 0.9.8g-15+lenny11 |
| Debian:6.0 | lighttpd | before 1.4.28-2+squeeze1.2 | 1.4.28-2+squeeze1.2 |
| Debian:6.0 | pound | before 2.6-1+deb6u1 | 2.6-1+deb6u1 |
| Debian:7 | pound | before 2.6-2+deb7u1 | 2.6-2+deb7u1 |
| Debian:8 | pound | before 2.6-6+deb8u1 | 2.6-6+deb8u1 |
| Maven | org.apache.tomcat:tomcat | from 5.0.0 · before 5.5.33 | 5.5.33 |
| Maven | org.apache.tomcat:tomcat | from 6.0.0 · before 6.0.32 | 6.0.32 |
| Maven | org.apache.tomcat:tomcat | from 7.0.0 · before 7.0.10 | 7.0.10 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | apache2 | before 2.4.23-4.1 | 2.4.23-4.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | MozillaThunderbird | before 45.5.1-1.1 | 45.5.1-1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | httpd | before 0:2.0.46-77.ent | 0:2.0.46-77.ent |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | httpd-debuginfo | before 0:2.0.46-77.ent | 0:2.0.46-77.ent |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | httpd-devel | before 0:2.0.46-77.ent | 0:2.0.46-77.ent |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | mod_ssl | before 1:2.0.46-77.ent | 1:2.0.46-77.ent |
+96
Same product
apache: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-42013Path Traversal and Remote Code Execution in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.49 and 2.4.50 (incomplete fix of CVE-2021-41773)KEV99Now
- CVE-2021-41773Path traversal and file disclosure vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.49KEV99Now
- CVE-2024-38475Apache HTTP Server weakness in mod_rewrite when first segment of substitution matches filesystem path.KEV96Now
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2009-3095Sep 8, 2009 · The mod_proxy_ftp module in the Apache HTTP Server allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and send arbitrary…24Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2009-2699Oct 13, 2009 · The Solaris pollset feature in the Event Port backend in poll/unix/port.c in the Apache Portable Runtime (APR) library before 1.3.9, as…34Monitor
- Later →CVE-2010-0010Feb 2, 2010 · Integer overflow in the ap_proxy_send_fb function in proxy/proxy_util.c in mod_proxy in the Apache HTTP Server before 1.3.42 on 64-bit…40Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:apache2 | 2.2.14-2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:lighttpd | 1.4.30-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:nginx | 0.7.64-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:nss | 3.12.6-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:openssl | 0.9.8k-6 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:pound | 2.6-6.1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:tomcat-native | 1.1.18-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.apache.tomcat:tomcat | 5.5.33 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.apache.tomcat:tomcat | 6.0.32 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.apache.tomcat:tomcat | 7.0.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:apache2 | 2.4.23-4.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:MozillaThunderbird | 45.5.1-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:httpd | 0:2.0.46-77.ent · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:httpd-debuginfo | 0:2.0.46-77.ent · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:httpd-devel | 0:2.0.46-77.ent · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:httpd-manual | 0:2.2.3-31.el5_4.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:httpd-suexec | 0:2.0.52-41.ent.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.6.0-ibm | 1:1.6.0.7-1jpp.3.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.6.0-ibm-demo | 1:1.6.0.7-1jpp.3.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.6.0-ibm-devel | 1:1.6.0.7-1jpp.3.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.6.0-ibm-javacomm | 1:1.6.0.7-1jpp.3.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.6.0-ibm-jdbc | 1:1.6.0.7-1jpp.3.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.6.0-ibm-plugin | 1:1.6.0.7-1jpp.3.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_ssl | 1:2.0.46-77.ent · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×2
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | remote | 2009-11-10 |
| Exploit-DB entry | remote | 2009-12-21 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:3 | 2022-03-30 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoCsame day
- TodayNov 13, 2026+6213 d
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-22-0412 · Jun 10, 2022(Mitsubishi Electric Bildirimi)
- TR-19-115 · Aug 22, 2019(NGINX Sunucu Güvenlik Güncellemesi)
- TR-18-110 · Aug 17, 2018 TR-18-110 (Apache, Tomcat için Güvenlik Güncellemeleri Yayınladı)
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-295 · Improper Certificate ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A certificate validation error is silently swallowed instead of terminating the connection. Often, code added for a test environment makes its way into production.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-295 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
override fun checkServerTrusted(chain: Array<X509Certificate>, type: String) {
// Left empty for the test environment
}Fixed
val client = OkHttpClient.Builder()
.certificatePinner(
CertificatePinner.Builder()
.add("api.sirius.example", "sha256/…")
.build()
).build()Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- blog.g-sec.lu/2009/11/tls-sslv3-renegotiation-vulnerability.html
- blogs.iss.net/archive/sslmitmiscsrf.html
- blogs.sun.com/security/entry/vulnerability_in_tls_protocol_during
- extendedsubset.com/?p=8
- extendedsubset.com/Renegotiating_TLS.pdf
- h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01945686
- h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c02436041
- itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docId=emr_na-c02273751
- kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-20491
- lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//May/msg00001.html
- lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//May/msg00002.html
- lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010/Jan/msg00000.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/039561.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/039957.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-May/040652.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-October/049455.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-October/049528.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-October/049702.html
- lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnutls-devel/2009-11/msg00029.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.