Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2020-25720· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

Samba: check attribute access rights for ldap adds of computers

A vulnerability was found in Samba where a delegated administrator with permission to create objects in Active Directory can write to all attributes of the newly created object, including security-sensitive attributes, even after the object's creation. This issue occurs because the administrator owns the object due to the lack of an Access Control List (ACL) at the time of creation and later being recognized as the 'creator owner.' The retained significant rights of the delegated administrator may not be well understood, potentially leading to unintended privilege escalation or security risks.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Nov 17, 2024
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
0.5% · 40th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

30

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.5%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · redhat
7.5
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • git.samba.org/samba.git samba

    • before 4.17.8affected · semver
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

    • all versionsunknown
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

    • all versionsunknown
    • all versionsunknown
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7

    • all versionsunknown
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

    • all versionsunknown
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

    • all versionsunknown
  • Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4

    • all versionsunknown
  • Red Hat Red Hat Storage 3

    • all versionsunknown

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12sambabefore 2:4.17.8+dfsg-12:4.17.8+dfsg-1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP5sambabefore 4.17.9+git.367.dae41ffdd1f-150500.3.5.14.17.9+git.367.dae41ffdd1f-150500.3.5.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP5sambabefore 4.17.9+git.367.dae41ffdd1f-150500.3.5.14.17.9+git.367.dae41ffdd1f-150500.3.5.1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2025-10230Samba: command injection in wins server hook script
    52Plan
  • CVE-2026-4631Cockpit: cockpit: unauthenticated remote code execution due to ssh command-line argument injection
    42Plan
  • CVE-2026-76578Ipa: freeipa: freeipa: unauthenticated ldap client can obtain administrator credentials via the self-managed-token aci
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2025-4404Freeipa: idm: privilege escalation from host to domain admin in freeipa
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2025-7493Freeipa: idm: privilege escalation from host to domain admin in freeipa
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2025-49796Libxml: type confusion leads to denial of service (dos)
    36Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
git.samba.org/samba.git samba4.17.8Vendor (CNA)
debian:samba2:4.17.8+dfsg-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:samba4.17.9+git.367.dae41ffdd1f-150500.3.5.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5Package registry (OSV)
suse:samba4.17.9+git.367.dae41ffdd1f-150500.3.5.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP5Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records