CVE-2026-115885: LangGraph CLI prints the registry push token in `langgraph deploy --verbose` output
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 16/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.11% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: langchain-ai langgraph 0.4.32.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to langchain-ai langgraph 0.4.32 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The LangGraph CLI is the official command-line interface for LangGraph. From 0.4.15 until 0.4.32, langgraph deploy --verbose passes a temporary registry push token on standard input to docker login --password-stdin, but the CLI subprocess helper prints command input in verbose mode. Anyone who can read resulting CI logs or terminal recordings before the token's maximum 12-hour expiration can pull deployment images or push images to that deployment's image repository. Deployments without --verbose and remote image builds are not affected, and the token alone cannot update a deployment to execute a pushed image. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.32.
- Published
- Oct 23, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 29, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 1th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-532
Report tools
Action score
16
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 16 / 40 · 4.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 4.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
langchain-ai langgraph
- >= 0.4.15, < 0.4.32affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | langgraph-cli | from 0.4.15 · before 0.4.32 | 0.4.32 |
Same product
langchain-ai: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-104873LangGraph SDK custom auth silently ignores actions= on resource decorators30Monitor
- CVE-2025-64439LangGraph Checkpoint affected by RCE in "json" mode of JsonPlusSerializer29Monitor
- CVE-2025-64104LangGraph SQLite Checkpoint Filter Key SQL Injection POC for SqliteStore29Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-71433Aug 6, 2026 · LangGraph: Namespace prefix matching crosses segment boundaries in Postgres and SQLite stores21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-115883Oct 23, 2026 · LangGraph: Namespace labels containing `.` reach other namespaces in Postgres and SQLite stores24Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-118667Oct 28, 2026 · LangGraph: Unencoded identifiers in LangGraph SDK v3 streaming can redirect authenticated GET requests17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| langchain-ai langgraph | 0.4.32 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
| PyPI:langgraph-cli | 0.4.32 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recordedsame day
- TodayNov 10, 2026+17 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- P
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-532 · Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log FileCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Exploit maturity— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.