CVE-2017-7466: Ansible before version 2.3 has an input validation vulnerability in the handling of data sent from client systems.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 33/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 3% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 87.6% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: ansible (Debian:12) 2.2.1.0-2; ansible-10 (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 10.6.0-1.1; ansible-11 (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 11.11.0-1.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to ansible (Debian:12) 2.2.1.0-2; ansible-10 (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 10.6.0-1.1; ansible-11 (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 11.11.0-1.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Ansible before version 2.3 has an input validation vulnerability in the handling of data sent from client systems. An attacker with control over a client system being managed by Ansible, and the ability to send facts back to the Ansible server, could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code on the Ansible server using the Ansible server privileges.
- GHSA-3m8p-xpm6-8ww3
- openSUSE-SU-2019:0238-1
- openSUSE-SU-2024:14244-1
- openSUSE-SU-2024:14536-1
- openSUSE-SU-2025:15605-1
- openSUSE-SU-2025:15753-1
- openSUSE-SU-2026:10944-1
- openSUSE-SU-2026:12447-1
- PYSEC-2018-40
- RHSA-2017:1244
- RHSA-2017:1334
- RHSA-2017:1476
- RHSA-2017:1499
- RHSA-2017:1599
- RHSA-2017:1685
- SUSE-SU-2017:3029-1
- SUSE-SU-2020:3309-1
- Published
- Jun 22, 2018
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.0% · 87th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
33
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 32 / 40 · 8.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.0%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.0
- CNA · redhat
- 8.0
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
[UNKNOWN] ansible
- ansible 2.3affected
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- redhat ansiblebefore 2.3
- redhat openstack10
- redhat openstack11
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | ansible | before 2.2.1.0-2 | 2.2.1.0-2 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ansible-10 | before 10.6.0-1.1 | 10.6.0-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ansible-11 | before 11.11.0-1.1 | 11.11.0-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ansible-12 | before 12.2.0-1.1 | 12.2.0-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ansible-13 | before 13.7.0-1.1 | 13.7.0-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ansible-14 | before 14.6.0-1.1 | 14.6.0-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ansible-9 | before 9.8.0-1.1 | 9.8.0-1.1 |
| PyPI | ansible | before 2.3.0.0 | 2.3.0.0 |
| PyPI | ansible | before 2.2.3.0 | 2.2.3.0 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | ansible | before 0:2.2.3.0-1.el7 | 0:2.2.3.0-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | atomic-openshift-utils | before 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 | 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | openshift-ansible | before 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 | 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | openshift-ansible-docs | before 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 | 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | openshift-ansible-filter-plugins | before 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 | 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | openshift-ansible-lookup-plugins | before 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 | 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | openshift-ansible-playbooks | before 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 | 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | openshift-ansible-roles | before 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 | 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | atomic-openshift-utils | before 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 | 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | openshift-ansible | before 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 | 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | openshift-ansible-callback-plugins | before 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 | 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | openshift-ansible-docs | before 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 | 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | openshift-ansible-filter-plugins | before 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 | 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | openshift-ansible-lookup-plugins | before 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 | 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | openshift-ansible-playbooks | before 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 | 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 |
+92
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-4678The safe_eval function in Ansible before 1.6.4 does not properly restrict the code subset, which allows remote attackers to execute…41Plan
- CVE-2014-4657The safe_eval function in Ansible before 1.5.4 does not properly restrict the code subset, which allows remote attackers to execute…40Plan
- CVE-2014-4967Multiple argument injection vulnerabilities in Ansible before 1.6.7 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging access…40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2017-7550Nov 21, 2017 · A flaw was found in the way Ansible (2.3.x before 2.3.3, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1) passed certain parameters to the jenkins_plugin module.40Plan
- ← EarlierCVE-2013-2233May 4, 2018 · Ansible before 1.2.1 makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks by leveraging failure to cache SSH host keys.30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2016-8628Jul 31, 2018 · Ansible before version 2.2.0 fails to properly sanitize fact variables sent from the Ansible controller.37Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:ansible | 2.2.1.0-2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ansible-10 | 10.6.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ansible-11 | 11.11.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ansible-12 | 12.2.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ansible-13 | 13.7.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ansible-14 | 14.6.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ansible-9 | 9.8.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:ansible | 2.2.3.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:ansible | 2.3.0.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ansible | 0:2.2.3.0-1.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ansible-doc | 0:2.3.0.0-4.el7 · Red Hat:rhev_manager:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:atomic-openshift-utils | 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openshift-ansible | 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openshift-ansible-callback-plugins | 0:3.3.82-1.git.0.af0c922.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openshift-ansible-docs | 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openshift-ansible-filter-plugins | 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openshift-ansible-lookup-plugins | 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openshift-ansible-playbooks | 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openshift-ansible-roles | 0:3.2.56-1.git.0.b844ab7.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.2::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ansible | 2.2.3.0-5.1 · SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ardana-ansible | 8.0+git.1596735237.54109b1-3.77.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ardana-cinder | 8.0+git.1596129856.263f430-3.43.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ardana-glance | 8.0+git.1593631779.76fa9b7-3.24.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ardana-mq | 8.0+git.1593618123.678c32b-3.26.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ardana-nova | 8.0+git.1601298847.dd01585-3.42.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ardana-osconfig | 8.0+git.1595885113.93abcbc-3.49.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-installation | 8.20201007-1.29.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-operations | 8.20201007-1.29.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-opsconsole | 8.20201007-1.29.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-planning | 8.20201007-1.29.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
+1
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (7 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.