CVE-2016-2178: The dsa_sign_setup function in crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c in OpenSSL through 1.0.2h does not properly ensure the use of constant-time operations…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 69.6% of all records.
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: openssl (Alpine:v3.2) 1.0.2h-r1; openssl (Debian:12) 1.0.2i-1; openssl (Debian:7) 1.0.1t-1+deb7u1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to openssl (Alpine:v3.2) 1.0.2h-r1; openssl (Debian:12) 1.0.2i-1; openssl (Debian:7) 1.0.1t-1+deb7u1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The dsa_sign_setup function in crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c in OpenSSL through 1.0.2h does not properly ensure the use of constant-time operations, which makes it easier for local users to discover a DSA private key via a timing side-channel attack.
- Published
- Jun 19, 2016
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.2% · 69th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-203
Report tools
Action score
22
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.2%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Check your server's TLS configurationRun the SSL check
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl |
| oracle | linux | cpe:2.3:o:oracle:linux |
| oracle | solaris | cpe:2.3:o:oracle:solaris |
| suse | linux enterprise | cpe:2.3:o:suse:linux_enterprise |
| nodejs | node.js | cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
Check your server's TLS configuration
The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.
Run the SSL checkAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- nodejs node.js0.10.0 and later · before 0.10.47
- nodejs node.js0.12.0 and later · before 0.12.16
- nodejs node.js4.0.0 and later · up to 4.1.2 inclusive
- nodejs node.js4.2.0 and later · before 4.6.0
- nodejs node.js5.0.0 and later · before 6.7.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.2 | openssl | before 1.0.2h-r1 | 1.0.2h-r1 |
| Debian:12 | openssl | before 1.0.2i-1 | 1.0.2i-1 |
| Debian:7 | openssl | before 1.0.1t-1+deb7u1 | 1.0.1t-1+deb7u1 |
| Debian:8 | openssl | before 1.0.1t-1+deb8u4 | 1.0.1t-1+deb8u4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl | before 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl-debuginfo | before 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl-devel | before 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl-perl | before 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl-static | before 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl | before 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 | 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-debuginfo | before 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 | 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-devel | before 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 | 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-libs | before 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 | 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-perl | before 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 | 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-static | before 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 | 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | jbcs-httpd24-httpd | before 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 | 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | jbcs-httpd24-httpd-debuginfo | before 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 | 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | jbcs-httpd24-httpd-devel | before 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 | 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | jbcs-httpd24-httpd-manual | before 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 | 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | jbcs-httpd24-httpd-selinux | before 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 | 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | jbcs-httpd24-httpd-src-zip | before 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 | 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | jbcs-httpd24-httpd-tools | before 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 | 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | jbcs-httpd24-httpd-zip | before 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 | 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | jbcs-httpd24-mod_auth_kerb | before 0:5.4-35.jbcs.el6 | 0:5.4-35.jbcs.el6 |
+96
Same product
openssl: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows…KEV90Now
- CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow65This week
- CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code…65This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2000-1254May 5, 2016 · crypto/rsa/rsa_gen.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.6 mishandles C bitwise-shift operations that exceed the size of an expression, which makes it…31Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2016-2177Jun 19, 2016 · OpenSSL through 1.0.2h incorrectly uses pointer arithmetic for heap-buffer boundary checks, which might allow remote attackers to cause a…52Plan
- Later →CVE-2016-2180Jul 31, 2016 · The TS_OBJ_print_bio function in crypto/ts/ts_lib.c in the X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP) implementation in…39Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:openssl | 1.0.2h-r1 · Alpine:v3.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:openssl | 1.0.2i-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:jbcs-httpd24-httpd | 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:jbcs-httpd24-httpd-debuginfo | 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:jbcs-httpd24-httpd-devel | 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:jbcs-httpd24-httpd-manual | 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:jbcs-httpd24-httpd-selinux | 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:jbcs-httpd24-httpd-src-zip | 0:2.4.23-102.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-debuginfo | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-devel | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-libs | 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-perl | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-static | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:compat-openssl098 | 0.9.8j-102.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-atk | 2.26.1-2.8.4 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-cairo | 1.15.10-2.13.4 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-gdk-pixbuf | 2.36.11-2.8.4 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-glib2 | 2.54.3-2.14.7 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-gtk3 | 3.10.9-2.15.3 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-harfbuzz | 1.7.5-2.7.4 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:MozillaFirefox | 68.2.0-78.51.4 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:MozillaFirefox-branding-SLED | 68-21.9.8 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:nodejs4 | 4.6.0-8.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Web and Scripting 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openssl | 1.0.1i-27.21.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openssl1 | 1.0.1g-0.52.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11-SECURITY | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-203 · Observable DiscrepancyCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00022.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00023.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00024.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00031.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00005.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00011.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00012.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00013.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00021.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00029.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00010.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00011.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00032.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1940.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2957.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1659.html
- seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Jul/31
- tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20160927-openssl
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.