CVE-2011-1007: Best Practical Solutions RT before 3.8.9 does not perform certain redirect actions upon a login, which allows physically proximate attackers…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 8/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.39% (FIRST EPSS).
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- No fixed version is recorded, but the references include a patch (commit or PR) link.
Low priority for now. See the fix and affected versions sections below.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Best Practical Solutions RT before 3.8.9 does not perform certain redirect actions upon a login, which allows physically proximate attackers to obtain credentials by resubmitting the login form via the back button of a web browser on an unattended workstation after an RT logout.
- Published
- Feb 28, 2011
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 34th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-255
Report tools
Action score
8
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 8 / 40 · 2.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| bestpractical | rt | cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- bestpractical rtup to 3.8.9 inclusive
- bestpractical rt1.0.0
- bestpractical rt1.0.1
- bestpractical rt1.0.2
- bestpractical rt1.0.3
- bestpractical rt1.0.4
- bestpractical rt1.0.5
- bestpractical rt1.0.6
+12 more rows
- bestpractical rt1.0.7
- bestpractical rt2.0.0
- bestpractical rt2.0.1
- bestpractical rt2.0.11
- bestpractical rt2.0.12
- bestpractical rt2.0.13
- bestpractical rt2.0.14
- bestpractical rt2.0.15
- bestpractical rt2.0.2
- bestpractical rt2.0.3
- bestpractical rt2.0.4
- bestpractical rt2.0.5
Same product
bestpractical: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-41075RT: SQL injection via entry_aggregator parameter in JSON search35Monitor
- CVE-2026-41076RT: LDAP authentication bypass via empty password32Monitor
- CVE-2011-5092Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x before 3.8.12 and 4.x before 4.0.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and gain privileges…31Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2009-4151Dec 2, 2009 · Session fixation vulnerability in html/Elements/SetupSessionCookie in Best Practical Solutions RT 3.0.0 through 3.6.9 and 3.8.x through 3.8.24Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2011-0009Jan 25, 2011 · Best Practical Solutions RT 3.x before 3.8.9rc2 and 4.x before 4.0.0rc4 uses the MD5 algorithm for password hashes, which makes it easier…18Monitor
- Later →CVE-2011-1008Feb 28, 2011 · Scrips_Overlay.pm in Best Practical Solutions RT before 3.8.9 does not properly restrict access to a TicketObj in a Scrip after a…16Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-255 · Credentials Management ErrorsCVSS vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (0)
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (16 more)Show less
- issues.bestpractical.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=15804
- lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-February/000186.html
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/22/12
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/22/16
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/22/6
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/23/22
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/24/7
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/24/8
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/24/9
- osvdb.org/71012
- secunia.com/advisories/43438
- www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0475
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/65771
- github.com/bestpractical/rt/commit/057552287159e801535e59b8fbd5bd98d1322069
- github.com/bestpractical/rt/commit/917c211820590950f7eb0521f7f43b31aeed44c4
- lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.