CVE-2026-14443: Incomplete log sanitization during bulk IPsec policy collection in Brocade SANnav before 3.0.1a
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 33/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.11% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Brocade SANnav 3.0.1.a, before 3.0.1.a.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Brocade SANnav 3.0.1.a, before 3.0.1.a or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Incomplete log sanitization during bulk IPsec policy collection in Brocade SANnav versions before 3.0.1a permit extension switch pre-shared keys to be written to system logs. Individuals with read access to container logs or support archives can obtain these keys, leading to the potential compromise of encrypted network tunnels.
- Published
- Sep 24, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 1, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 1th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-532
Report tools
Action score
33
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 33 / 40 · 8.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · brocade
- 8.4
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (brocade). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Brocade SANnav
- before 3.0.1.aaffected · Brocade SANnavfixed in before 3.0.1.a
Same product
brocade: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-82372Improper handling of sensitive data during IPsec policy creation and modification in Brocade SANnav before 3.0.1.a34Monitor
- CVE-2026-82371Plaintext exposure of sensitive authentication data in SANnav discovery service log files34Monitor
- CVE-2026-82370Unauthenticated remote command injection in the Brocade SANnav orchestrator HTTP service34Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-14441Sep 24, 2026 · Logic flaw in SANnav Java cache key handling object comparison handling27Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-14442Sep 24, 2026 · Information exposure vulnerability in the job scheduling component of SANnav before 3.0.1a27Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-85417Sep 25, 2026 · Incomplete property masking in the SANnav logging subsystem25Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Brocade SANnav | 3.0.1.a | Vendor (CNA) |
| Brocade SANnav | before 3.0.1.a | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-823710 days apartPlaintext exposure of sensitive authentication data in SANnav discovery service log files34Monitor
- CVE-2026-823720 days apartImproper handling of sensitive data during IPsec policy creation and modification in Brocade SANnav before 3.0.1.a34Monitor
- CVE-2026-144420 days apartInformation exposure vulnerability in the job scheduling component of SANnav before 3.0.1a27Monitor
- CVE-2026-854171 days apartIncomplete property masking in the SANnav logging subsystem25Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-532 · Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log FileCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.