CVE-2026-11448: GL.iNet GL-MT3000 Minidlna Service rpc realpath command injection
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 20/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.5% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 75.4% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: GL.iNet GL-MT3000 4.7.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to GL.iNet GL-MT3000 4.7 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A weakness has been identified in GL.iNet GL-MT3000 up to 4.4.5. The affected element is the function realpath of the file /rpc of the component Minidlna Service. This manipulation of the argument kube. set causes command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Upgrading to version 4.7 is sufficient to fix this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms: "Starting from version 4.7, SDK has added global protection to intercept malicious injection".
- Published
- Jun 6, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 23, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.5% · 75th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-74
Report tools
Action score
20
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulDB
- 5.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulDB). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
GL.iNet GL-MT3000
- 4.7not affected
- 4.4.0, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, 4.4.3, 4.4.4, 4.4.5affected
Same product
gl.inet: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-18686GL.iNet GL-MT3000 nas-web RPC Wrapper glc nas-web.add_user command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-18685GL.iNet GL-MT3000 modem.so glc set_upgrade command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-18684GL.iNet GL-MT3000 modem.so glc remove_profile command injection36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-11447Jun 6, 2026 · GL.iNet GL-MT3000 MTK Backend iwinfo.so iwinfo_backend command injection8Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-11449Jun 6, 2026 · GL.iNet GL-MT3000 LuCI JSON-RPC rpc rpc_sys command injection21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-11450Jun 6, 2026 · GL.iNet GL-MT3000 Path Normalization dlopen command injection27Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| GL.iNet GL-MT3000 | 4.7 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- VulDB CNA Teamcoordinator
- strforexc (VulDB User)reporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-1860158 days apartGL.iNet GL-MT3000 ovpn-client.so Native Plugin glc ovpn-client.check_config command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-1860258 days apartGL.iNet GL-MT3000 ovpn-client.so Native Plugin glc ovpn-client.get_recommend_config command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-1868458 days apartGL.iNet GL-MT3000 modem.so glc remove_profile command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-1868559 days apartGL.iNet GL-MT3000 modem.so glc set_upgrade command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-1868659 days apartGL.iNet GL-MT3000 nas-web RPC Wrapper glc nas-web.add_user command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-121868 days apartGL.iNet GL-MT3000 Tor Proxy Service Configuration tor replace_country command injection30Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-74 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- HTTP Request SplittingCAPEC-105likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
- Format String InjectionCAPEC-135likelihood: High · High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.