Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA VulnCheck

CVE-2026-100668: Grav before 2.0.25 Sandbox Escape via array Filter

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.28% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: getgrav grav 2.0.25.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to getgrav grav 2.0.25 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Grav 2.0.0 through 2.0.24 contain a Twig content sandbox escape. The `array` filter (and its identical function form) is on the sandbox allowlist but is registered without the needs_is_sandboxed guard that print_r, vardump, json_encode, yaml_encode and string carry, and its implementation calls toArray() — or falls back to an (array) cast — without consulting the sandbox method allowlist. Because the `grav` Twig global is the raw Pimple-based dependency injection container, a user who can author Twig in page content can evaluate `grav|array` to read the container's private $values array, including the un-redacted Config service; a second array cast returns the entire configuration tree, disclosing plugin credentials, SMTP and OAuth secrets, Redis passwords, proxy URLs and the security.* subtree that the sandbox's redaction is meant to hide. Because the payload is stored in page content, the disclosed configuration is rendered to anonymous visitors. Grav 1.7 is not affected as it has no Twig content sandbox. Fixed in Grav 2.0.25.

HighCVSS 7.1 · v4.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Sep 26, 2026
Updated
Sep 28, 2026
EPSS
0.2% · 20th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

28

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
28 / 40 · 7.1 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · VulnCheck
7.1
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-100668

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for getgrav records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • getgrav grav

    • 2.0.25not affected
    • before 2.0.25affected · semver

Same product

getgrav: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2025-50286A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in Grav CMS v1.7.48 allows an authenticated admin to upload a malicious plugin via the /admin/to
    60This week
  • CVE-2024-27921Grav File Upload Path Traversal vulnerability
    53Plan
  • CVE-2025-66301Grav ihas Broken Access Control which allows an Editor to modify the page's YAML Frontmatter to alter form processing actions
    40Plan

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-92916Sep 17, 2026 · Grav through 2.0.21 Unauthenticated Information Disclosure via Clockwork
    34Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-100667Sep 26, 2026 · grav-plugin-login 3.8.7 through 3.9.6 Two-Factor Authentication Bypass
    27Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-100669Sep 26, 2026 · Grav before 2.0.25 Sensitive File Disclosure via Case-Variation Bypass
    34Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
getgrav grav2.0.25Vendor (CNA)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-1006710 days apartGrav before 2.0.25 Session Cookie Theft via Twig Sandbox
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2026-929169 days apartGrav through 2.0.21 Unauthenticated Information Disclosure via Clockwork
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2026-929179 days apartGrav 2.0.0-rc.1 through 2.0.21 Configuration Disclosure via print_r
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2026-10932516 days apartGrav from 2.0.22 before 2.1.7 Clockwork Profiler Authentication Bypass via Proxy
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2026-11278123 days apartGrav 2.0.0 before 2.2.2 Information Disclosure via Form config-*@ Directives
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2026-11760431 days apartGrav from 1.7.53.3 before 1.7.53.6 Clockwork Profiler Authorization Bypass via Loopback Fallback
    34Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
X

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-200 · Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

CVSS vector

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

nvd-secondary

Root cause

The extension requests broader permissions than its function needs and sends the data it collects out for purposes beyond its stated function.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-200 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

json
{  "permissions": ["tabs", "<all_urls>"],  "background": { "service_worker": "analytics.js" }}

Fixed

json
{  "permissions": ["activeTab"],  "host_permissions": ["https://yildiz.example/*"]}

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓
  2. SSVC exploitation— → none

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (1 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records