CVE-2025-12351: Inadequate access control measure allows unauthorized users to access restricted administrative functions
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 27/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.23% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: Honeywell S35 3M/5M/8M/Pinhole/Kit Camera 2025.08.28; Honeywell S35 AI Fisheye&Dual Sensor/Micro Dome/Full Color Eyeball&Bullet Camera 2025.08.22; Honeywell S35 Thermal Camera 2025.08.26.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Honeywell S35 3M/5M/8M/Pinhole/Kit Camera 2025.08.28; Honeywell S35 AI Fisheye&Dual Sensor/Micro Dome/Full Color Eyeball&Bullet Camera 2025.08.22; Honeywell S35 Thermal Camera 2025.08.26 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Honeywell S35 Series Cameras contains an authorization bypass Vulnerability through User controller key. An attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Privilege Escalation to admin privileged functionalities . Honeywell also recommends updating to the most recent version of this product, service or offering (S35 Pinhole/Kit Camera to version 2025.08.28, S35 AI Fisheye & Dual Sensor/Micro Dome/Full Color Eyeball & Bullet Camera to version 2025.08.22, S35 Thermal Camera to version 2025.08.26).
- Published
- Oct 27, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 18, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 13th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-639
Report tools
Action score
27
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 27 / 40 · 6.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · Honeywell
- 6.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Honeywell). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Honeywell S35 3M/5M/8M/Pinhole/Kit Camera
- 2022.02.28 and later · before 2025.08.28affected · date
Honeywell S35 AI Fisheye&Dual Sensor/Micro Dome/Full Color Eyeball&Bullet Camera
- 2024.08.10 and later · before 2025.08.22affected · date
Honeywell S35 Thermal Camera
- 2024.10.21 and later · before 2025.08.26affected · date
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Honeywell S35 3M/5M/8M/Pinhole/Kit Camera | 2025.08.28 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Honeywell S35 AI Fisheye&Dual Sensor/Micro Dome/Full Color Eyeball&Bullet Camera | 2025.08.22 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Honeywell S35 Thermal Camera | 2025.08.26 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled KeyCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-639 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);
res.json(invoice);Fixed
const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({
id: req.params.id,
ownerId: req.user.id,
});
if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);
res.json(invoice);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.