CVE-2021-32718: Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in RabbitMQ management UI
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 72.9% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: rabbitmq-server (Debian:12) 3.9.4-1; rabbitmq-server (openSUSE:Leap 15.2) 3.8.3-lp152.2.3.1; rabbitmq-server (openSUSE:Leap 15.3) 3.8.11-3.3.3.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 3.1, NVD 5.4.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to rabbitmq-server (Debian:12) 3.9.4-1; rabbitmq-server (openSUSE:Leap 15.2) 3.8.3-lp152.2.3.1; rabbitmq-server (openSUSE:Leap 15.3) 3.8.11-3.3.3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
RabbitMQ is a multi-protocol messaging broker. In rabbitmq-server prior to version 3.8.17, a new user being added via management UI could lead to the user's bane being rendered in a confirmation message without proper `<script>` tag sanitization, potentially allowing for JavaScript code execution in the context of the page. In order for this to occur, the user must be signed in and have elevated permissions (other user management). The vulnerability is patched in RabbitMQ 3.8.17. As a workaround, disable `rabbitmq_management` plugin and use CLI tools for management operations and Prometheus and Grafana for metrics and monitoring.
- Published
- Jun 28, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.4% · 72th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-80
Report tools
Action score
21
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.4%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.4
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 3.1
- 2.3 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| vmware | rabbitmq | cpe:2.3:a:vmware:rabbitmq |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- vmware rabbitmqbefore 3.8.17
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
rabbitmq rabbitmq-server
- < 3.8.17affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | rabbitmq-server | before 3.9.4-1 | 3.9.4-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.2 | rabbitmq-server | before 3.8.3-lp152.2.3.1 | 3.8.3-lp152.2.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | rabbitmq-server | before 3.8.11-3.3.3 | 3.8.11-3.3.3 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | elixir115 | before 1.15.7-150300.7.5.1 | 1.15.7-150300.7.5.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | erlang26 | before 26.2.1-150300.7.5.1 | 26.2.1-150300.7.5.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | rabbitmq-server313 | before 3.13.1-150600.13.5.3 | 3.13.1-150600.13.5.3 |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.1::el8 | rabbitmq-server | before 0:3.7.23-9.el8ost | 0:3.7.23-9.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | rabbitmq-server | before 0:3.8.16-3.el8ost | 0:3.8.16-3.el8ost |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP2 | rabbitmq-server | before 3.8.3-3.3.4 | 3.8.3-3.3.4 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP3 | rabbitmq-server | before 3.8.11-3.3.3 | 3.8.11-3.3.3 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | elixir115 | before 1.15.7-150300.7.5.1 | 1.15.7-150300.7.5.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | erlang26 | before 26.2.1-150300.7.5.1 | 26.2.1-150300.7.5.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | rabbitmq-server313 | before 3.13.1-150600.13.5.3 | 3.13.1-150600.13.5.3 |
Same product
vmware: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-22116RabbitMQ all versions prior to 3.8.16 are prone to a denial of service vulnerability due to improper input validation in AMQP 1.0 client con30Monitor
- CVE-2023-46118Denial of Service by publishing large messages over the HTTP API19Monitor
- CVE-2021-32719Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in RabbitMQ federation management plugin19Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:rabbitmq-server | 3.9.4-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:elixir115 | 1.15.7-150300.7.5.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:erlang26 | 26.2.1-150300.7.5.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:rabbitmq-server | 3.8.3-lp152.2.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:rabbitmq-server313 | 3.13.1-150600.13.5.3 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rabbitmq-server | 0:3.8.16-3.el8ost · Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:elixir115 | 1.15.7-150300.7.5.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:erlang26 | 26.2.1-150300.7.5.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:rabbitmq-server | 3.8.3-3.3.4 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:rabbitmq-server313 | 3.13.1-150600.13.5.3 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-80 · Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS)CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.