CVE-2026-95761: Authenticated Improper Certificate Validation leads to Information Disclosure in HPE Networking Fabric Composer
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 23/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.12% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
An improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to obtain sensitive information.
- Published
- Nov 3, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 9, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 2th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-295
Report tools
Action score
23
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 23 / 40 · 5.9 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · hpe
- 5.9
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Check your site's encryptionRun the SSL check
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Check your site's encryption
This vulnerability is about certificate validation or weak cryptography. The free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers.
Run the SSL checkVersions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (hpe). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Fabric Composer
- 7.4.0 and later · up to and including 7.4.0affected · semver
- 7.0.0 and later · up to and including 7.3.4affected · semver
Same product
Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-95731Unauthenticated Hardcoded Password Vulnerabilities in HPE Networking Fabric Composer Command-Line Interface allow Unauthorized Administrative Access39Monitor
- CVE-2026-95733Use of Hardcoded Credentials in HPE Networking Fabric Composer Could Allow Adjacent Arbitrary Code Execution38Monitor
- CVE-2026-95732Authentication Bypass in HPE Networking Fabric Composer allows Arbitrary Code Execution38Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-95759Nov 3, 2026 · Authenticated Audit Log Bypass in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-95760Nov 3, 2026 · Privilege Escalation Vulnerability in HPE Networking Fabric Composer API25Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-95762Nov 3, 2026 · Authenticated Insufficient Session Expiration Vulnerability in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer23Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-957350 days apartImproper Certificate Validation in HPE Networking Fabric Composer34Monitor
- CVE-2026-957360 days apartUnauthenticated Adjacent Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerabilities in HPE Networking Fabric Composer33Monitor
- CVE-2026-957400 days apartUnauthenticated Adjacent Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability leads to Information Disclosure in HPE Networking Fabric Composer32Monitor
- CVE-2026-957500 days apartUnauthenticated Improper Certificate Validation in HPE Networking Fabric Composer30Monitor
- CVE-2026-957510 days apartUnauthenticated Improper Certificate Validation Leads to Authentication Bypass in HPE Networking Fabric Composer29Monitor
- CVE-2026-957550 days apartUnauthenticated Adjacent Improper Certificate Validation allows Interception of Management Traffic in HPE Networking Fabric Composer27Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-295 · Improper Certificate ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A certificate validation error is silently swallowed instead of terminating the connection. Often, code added for a test environment makes its way into production.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-295 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
override fun checkServerTrusted(chain: Array<X509Certificate>, type: String) {
// Left empty for the test environment
}Fixed
val client = OkHttpClient.Builder()
.certificatePinner(
CertificatePinner.Builder()
.add("api.sirius.example", "sha256/…")
.build()
).build()Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (2)
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Exploit maturity— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.