Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA CIRCL

CVE-2026-95683: MISP Overmind Event View Discloses Report Content Bypassing Report-Level ACL

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.38% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: MISP MISP 2.5.47.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to MISP MISP 2.5.47 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

In MISP, the Overmind event view enriches an event with its most recent attached report for preview purposes. The enrichment logic fetched the report using only the event ID as the lookup condition, without applying the report's own distribution/ACL constraints. Because MISP reports carry an independent distribution setting that can be more restrictive than the parent event's distribution, an authenticated user who had read access to the event could retrieve and view a report whose distribution explicitly excluded that user. Additionally, the query did not filter out soft-deleted reports, allowing retrieval of reports that had been administratively removed. The result is an unauthorized disclosure of threat-intelligence report content to users who should not have access under the report's own access-control policy. The vulnerability requires an authenticated MISP user with at least read access to the affected event.

MediumCVSS 5.3 · v4.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Sep 22, 2026
Updated
Sep 22, 2026
EPSS
0.3% · 32th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

21

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.3%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · CIRCL
5.3
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-95683

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for misp records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (CIRCL). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • MISP MISP

    • before 2.5.47affected · semver

Same product

misp: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-103655MISP TOTP Code Replay Allows Duplicate Authentication Within Validity Period
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-90961MISP LdapAuth and LinOTPAuth Authentication Bypass via Empty or Non-String Credentials
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-56422MISP Core: Mass Assignment and Object Re-ownership via Unvalidated Request Fields
    37Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-95679Sep 22, 2026 · MISP Unauthenticated Blind SSRF via XML Body Processing
    27Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-95682Sep 22, 2026 · MISP Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Unescaped Organization Name in Admin Email View
    19Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-95685Sep 22, 2026 · MISP Missing Authorization on replaceSuggestionInReport Event Report Action
    21Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
MISP MISP2.5.47Vendor (CNA)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-5642292 days apartMISP Core: Mass Assignment and Object Re-ownership via Unvalidated Request Fields
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-54361102 days apartMISP mass assignment vulnerabilities allow unauthorized modification of ownership and delegation records
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2026-1032358 days apartMISP Event Delegation Mass Assignment Allows Retargeting Delegation to Arbitrary Events
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2026-54360102 days apartMISP sharing group creation mass assignment allows unauthorized takeover of existing sharing groups
    33Monitor
  • CVE-2026-918467 days apartMISP Collection Element Add Missing Authorization on Referenced Object UUID
    28Monitor
  • CVE-2026-54357102 days apartMISP improper authorization allows organization administrators to modify site administrator user settings
    20Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
X

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

CVSS vector

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

nvd-secondary

Root cause

The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-639 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);res.json(invoice);

Fixed

ts
const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({  id: req.params.id,  ownerId: req.user.id,});if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);res.json(invoice);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records