CVE-2026-94287: Denial of service via unsigned underflow in libXpm's write path
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.12% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: x.org libXpm 3.5.19.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to x.org libXpm 3.5.19 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A denial of service via unsigned underflow in libXpm's write path in libXpm before 3.5.19 could be used by local attackers to cause unbounded CPU usage and memory exhaustion.
- Published
- Sep 28, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 29, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 2th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-1050
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · suse
- 5.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (suse). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
x.org libXpm
- before 3.5.19affected · rpm
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.24 | libxpm | before 3.5.20-r0 | 3.5.20-r0 |
| Debian:12 | libxpm | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | libxpm | before 1:3.5.20-1 | 1:3.5.20-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | libXpm | before 3.5.17-160000.4.1 | 3.5.17-160000.4.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | libXpm | before 3.5.18-3.1 | 3.5.18-3.1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | libXpm | before 0:3.5.19-4.hum1 | 0:3.5.19-4.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | libXpm-devel | before 0:3.5.19-4.hum1 | 0:3.5.19-4.hum1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | libXpm | before 3.5.12-150000.3.13.1 | 3.5.12-150000.3.13.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | libXpm | before 3.5.17-160000.4.1 | 3.5.17-160000.4.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server LTSS Extended Security 12 SP5 | libXpm | before 3.5.11-6.13.1 | 3.5.11-6.13.1 |
Same product
x.org: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2016-10164Multiple integer overflows in libXpm before 3.5.12, when a program requests parsing XPM extensions on a 64-bit platform, allow remote…41Plan
- CVE-2022-4883A flaw was found in libXpm.35Monitor
- CVE-2022-46285A flaw was found in libXpm.30Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-44617Feb 6, 2023 · A flaw was found in libXpm.30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-43788Oct 10, 2023 · Libxpm: out of bounds read in xpmcreatexpmimagefrombuffer()22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| x.org libXpm | 3.5.19 | Vendor (CNA) |
| alpine:libxpm | 3.5.20-r0 · Alpine:v3.24 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:libxpm | 1:3.5.20-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:libXpm | 3.5.18-3.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libXpm | 0:3.5.19-4.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libXpm-devel | 0:3.5.19-4.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:libXpm | 3.5.17-160000.4.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recordedsame day
- TodayNov 12, 2026+45 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- AISLE in partnershipRed Hatfinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-1050 · Excessive Platform Resource Consumption within a LoopCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
- SSVC exploitation— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.