CVE-2026-9216: Insufficient input validation vulnerability exists in certain NETGEAR RAX Models
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 4/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.36% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
An insufficient input validation vulnerability in the listed NETGEAR RAX series models allows a network-adjacent attacker having network access (such as WiFi credentials) to crash the router's management UI. There is no confidentiality or integrity impact. A crash of the router's management UI does not impact the availability of the router's core services like WiFi network.
- Published
- Sep 8, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 13, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 29th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-121
Report tools
Action score
4
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 4 / 40 · 1.2 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · NETGEAR
- 1.2
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/AU:Y/R:A/V:D/RE:L/U:Amber
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| netgear | rax30 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:rax30_firmware |
| netgear | rax30 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:rax30 |
| netgear | rax35 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:rax35_firmware |
| netgear | rax35 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:rax35 |
| netgear | rax38 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:rax38_firmware |
| netgear | rax38 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:rax38 |
| netgear | rax40 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:rax40_firmware |
| netgear | rax40 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:rax40 |
| netgear | raxe300 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:raxe300_firmware |
| netgear | raxe300 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:raxe300 |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- netgear rax30 firmwarebefore 1.0.9.92
- netgear rax35 firmwarebefore 1.0.10.72
- netgear rax38 firmwarebefore 1.0.6.106
- netgear rax40 firmwarebefore 1.0.6.106
- netgear raxe300 firmwarebefore 1.0.10.72
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (NETGEAR). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
NETGEAR RAX30
- before V1.0.9.92affected
NETGEAR RAX35
- before V1.0.10.72affected
NETGEAR RAX38
- before V1.0.6.106affected
NETGEAR RAX40
- before V1.0.6.106affected
NETGEAR RAXE300
- before V1.0.9.82affected
Same product
netgear: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2023-27853NETGEAR Nighthawk WiFi6 Router prior to V1.0.10.94 contains a format string vulnerability in a SOAP service that could allow an attacker to 45Plan
- CVE-2023-48725A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the JSON Parsing getblockschedule() functionality of Netgear RAX30 1.0.11.96 and 1.0.741Plan
- CVE-2025-44658In Netgear RAX30 V1.0.10.94, a PHP-FPM misconfiguration vulnerability is caused by not following the specification to only limit FPM to .php39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-51635Nov 22, 2024 · NETGEAR RAX30 fing_dil Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability35Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-44652Jul 21, 2025 · In Netgear RAX30 V1.0.10.94_3, the USERLIMIT_GLOBAL option is set to 0 in multiple bftpd-related configuration files.30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-12943Nov 11, 2025 · Improper certificate validation in firmware update logic in NETGEAR RAX30 and RAXE30020Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- mr_meefinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-121 · Stack-based Buffer OverflowCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:A/V:D/RE:L/U:Amber
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (5 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.