CVE-2026-79656: OAuth and OIDC tokens written unredacted to server logs by the Generic OAuth, Google and GitLab connectors
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 24/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.16% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Grafana Grafana Enterprise 12.4.11, 13.0.9, 13.1.6; Grafana Grafana OSS 12.4.11, 13.0.9, 13.1.6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Grafana Grafana Enterprise 12.4.11, 13.0.9, 13.1.6; Grafana Grafana OSS 12.4.11, 13.0.9, 13.1.6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A user with read access to Grafana's server logs, or to a log store they are shipped to, can recover the OAuth and OIDC access, refresh and ID tokens of users who sign in through the Generic OAuth, Google or GitLab providers. Grafana writes these tokens to its logs unredacted when an access or ID token is not a valid JWT, when the ID token is missing (at debug level) or is not a string (exposure of sensitive information in log files). The exposure is bounded by the scopes granted to the configured OAuth client.
- Published
- Oct 28, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 5, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 5th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-532
Report tools
Action score
24
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 24 / 40 · 6.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GRAFANA
- 6.0
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GRAFANA). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Grafana Grafana Enterprise
- up to and including 12.3.11affected · semver
- 12.4.0 and later · before 12.4.11affected · semver
- 13.0.0 and later · before 13.0.9affected · semver
- 13.1.0 and later · before 13.1.6affected · semver
- 13.2.0 and later · before 13.2.2affected · semver
Grafana Grafana OSS
- up to and including 12.3.11affected · semver
- 12.4.0 and later · before 12.4.11affected · semver
- 13.0.0 and later · before 13.0.9affected · semver
- 13.1.0 and later · before 13.1.6affected · semver
- 13.2.0 and later · before 13.2.2affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.24 | grafana | before 12.4.14-r0 | 12.4.14-r0 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | grafana | before 12.4.11-1.1 | 12.4.11-1.1 |
Same product
grafana: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-15815CVE-2026-15815 CVE Record35Monitor
- CVE-2026-33379Dashboard snapshot permission bypass34Monitor
- CVE-2026-76154CVE-2026-76154 CVE Record29Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-19197Aug 26, 2026 · Broken access control in dashboard snapshots25Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-13720Sep 30, 2026 · Editor can forge file-provisioning provenance on dashboards via the dashboard API21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-88858Oct 28, 2026 · Server-side expression parser denial of service26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Grafana Grafana Enterprise | 12.4.11 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Grafana Grafana Enterprise | 13.0.9 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Grafana Grafana Enterprise | 13.1.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Grafana Grafana Enterprise | 13.2.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Grafana Grafana OSS | 12.4.11 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Grafana Grafana OSS | 13.0.9 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Grafana Grafana OSS | 13.1.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Grafana Grafana OSS | 13.2.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| alpine:grafana | 12.4.14-r0 · Alpine:v3.24 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:grafana | 12.4.11-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recordedsame day
- TodayNov 7, 2026+10 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Baptiste Roux (baprx)finder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-532 · Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log FileCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Exploit maturity— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.