CVE.org (no NVD analysis yet)· CNA sap

CVE-2026-76966: Multiple vulnerabilities in Application Server ABAP of SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform

HighCVSS 8.9 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 35/100)

The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.23% (FIRST EPSS).
Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).

Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Due to improper RFC protocol validation in the SAP Kernel used by the Application Server ABAP of SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform, an unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted RFC request that exploits logical errors in memory management, leading to memory corruption. This could lead to a high impact on confidentiality and integrity with low impact on availability of the application.

EUVD-2026-120658

Published: Nov 10, 2026
Updated: Nov 11, 2026
EPSS: 0.2% · 14th percentile
CWE: CWE-294

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS: 35 / 40 · 8.9 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 0 / 30 · 0.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical impact: total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD: —
CNA · sap: 8.9; NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
No public exploit code on record
No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (sap). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

SAP_SE SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform
- KRNL64NUC 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL64UC 7.22, 7.53, 8.04, KERNEL 7.22, 7.54, 7.77, 7.93, 9.16, 9.18, 9.20affected

Same product

sap_se: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2026-76965OS Command Injection vulnerability in ABAP Application Server for SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform
39Monitor
CVE-2026-34265Memory Corruption vulnerability in Application Server ABAP for SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform
39Monitor
CVE-2026-76970Memory Corruption vulnerability in Application Server ABAP for SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform
30Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

← EarlierCVE-2026-76963Sep 7, 2026 · Missing Authorization Check in Application Server ABAP of SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform
17Monitor
← EarlierCVE-2026-109796Nov 10, 2026 · Multiple vulnerabilities in Application Server ABAP of SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform
17Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

—

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.