CVE-2026-75826: Teltonika Command Injection in Backup function
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 34/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.93% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 61% of all records.
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Teltonika Networks ATRM 7.24.6; Teltonika Networks CAP 7.24.6; Teltonika Networks DAP 7.24.6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Teltonika Networks ATRM 7.24.6; Teltonika Networks CAP 7.24.6; Teltonika Networks DAP 7.24.6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Command injection in the backup function in Teltonika Networks RUTOS 7.22 before 7.24.6 and 7.25 before 7.25.2 (RUT, RUTX, RUTM, RUTC, ATRM, CAP, OXA, DAP, TRB, OTD, and EBG devices), RUTOS 7.22 before 7.25.2 (TAP devices), and TSWOS 1.9 before 1.10.4 (TSW and SWM devices) allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands.
- Published
- Oct 13, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.9% · 61th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-78
Report tools
Action score
34
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 34 / 40 · 8.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.9%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · tlt_net
- 8.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (tlt_net). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Teltonika Networks ATRM
- 7.22 and later · before 7.24.6affected · ATRM
Teltonika Networks CAP
- 7.22 and later · before 7.24.6affected · CAP
Teltonika Networks DAP
- 7.22 and later · before 7.24.6affected · DAP
Teltonika Networks EBG
- 7.22 and later · before 7.24.6affected · EBG
Teltonika Networks OTD
- 7.22 and later · before 7.24.6affected · OTD
Teltonika Networks OXA
- 7.22 and later · before 7.24.6affected · OXA
Teltonika Networks RUT
- 7.22 and later · before 7.24.6affected · RUT
Teltonika Networks RUTC
- 7.22 and later · before 7.24.6affected · RUTC
Teltonika Networks RUTM
- 7.22 and later · before 7.24.6affected · RUTM
- 7.22 and later · before 7.25.2affected · RUTM
Teltonika Networks RUTX
- 7.22 and later · before 7.24.6affected · RUTX
- 7.22 and later · before 7.25.2affected · RUTX
Teltonika Networks SWM
- 1.9 and later · before 1.10.4affected · SWM
Teltonika Networks TAP
- 7.22 and later · before 7.25.2affected · TAP
Same product
teltonika networks: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-8914Command injection in Profile change function33Monitor
- CVE-2026-16455Local privilege escalation via improper input sanitization in execl() call27Monitor
- CVE-2026-18368Heap buffer overflow in Modbusgwd24Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-8256Dec 10, 2024 · Incorrect Permission Assignment in RutOS based routers and TSWOS based managed switches23Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Teltonika Networks ATRM | 7.24.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks CAP | 7.24.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks DAP | 7.24.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks EBG | 7.24.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks OTD | 7.24.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks OXA | 7.24.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks RUT | 7.24.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks RUTC | 7.24.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks RUTM | 7.24.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks RUTM | 7.25.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks RUTX | 7.24.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks RUTX | 7.25.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks SWM | 1.10.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks TAP | 7.25.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks TRB | 7.24.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Teltonika Networks TSW | 1.10.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recordedsame day
- TodayNov 7, 2026+25 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Root cause
User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-78 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const host = req.body.host;
exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);Fixed
const host = req.body.host;
if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);
execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Exploit maturity— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.